April 14, 2025

SUCH SNOWFLAKES:

WorldTrump spotlight divides S.Africa’s Afrikaners (AFP, April 14, 2025)

Mainly Afrikaner-led governments imposed the race-based apartheid system that denied the black majority political and economic rights until it was voted out in 1994.

Under apartheid, whites benefited from reserved access to jobs, education, land and markets.

The privilege has a legacy. For example, unemployment among white South Africans stands at more than six percent compared to more than 35 percent for the black population.

Prominent journalist and author, Max du Preez, was scathing of complaints of persecution among his fellow Afrikaners.

“Afrikaners are far better off materially and culturally today than in 1994,” he told AFP.

Afrikaans culture is thriving, he said, adding that it is the only local language with four television channels and an array of newspapers, magazines and festivals.

The fear of white persecution “is a phantom pain: it’s not about what is actually happening, but about what could happen”, he said.

“Nothing is coming. The last thing that will happen here is a race war.”

Afrikaner “disillusion” grew as the post-apartheid economy struggled with corruption and governance, said professor Christi van der Westhuizen, author of several books on Afrikaner identity.

This made many susceptible to “divisive” narratives pushed by right-wing groups with roots in apartheid, even if “significant sections of Afrikaners remain vehemently opposed” to these ideas, she said.

Such groups have found a sympathetic audience in the United States, where Trump is close to conservative South African-born billionaire Elon Musk.

THERE IS NO PRO-LIFE PARTY:

Jens Ludwig on American Gun Violence (Social Science Bites, April 1, 2025)

Jens Ludwig: Yeah, let me start off by acknowledging the first part of the question, which the data suggests, is very true, that the 400 million guns that the United States has for a country of 330 million people is without question part of the story. You know, we have state level data on a proxy for household gun ownership. And we can see that over a decades-long period, the household gun ownership rate between the northern part of the United States the southern part of the United States have been converging over time, and we can see over that same time period that murder rates have been converging across these regions as well. So it’s a nice sort of natural experiment that points to something that’s suggestive of a causal relationship between overall gun availability and murders. And so, if you had a wand that one could wave, that would get rid of the 400 million guns in the United States, I think it is very much true that the United States would become much, much safer. But as you say, that’s not the whole story.

David Edmonds: America is not the only country awash with guns. My elder brother lives in Switzerland, where almost everybody has a gun, but they don’t have the murder rate that you have. So it seems like guns alone can’t be the answer.

Jens Ludwig: Yeah, gun violence is really the product of two things, not just one thing. My little cartoon equation for this in the book is gun violence equals guns plus violence. What you can see in the data is that, for instance, that Switzerland and Canada have almost identical levels of gun ownership, and yet, the murder rate in Canada is multiple times what you see in Switzerland. And I think the explanation there is that the rate of violent crime is substantially different between Switzerland and Canada. And so I think what the data seemed to suggest is that guns don’t cause violent behavior, cause violent crime. Guns make the violence that happens much more deadly. So you can have lots of guns and not many murders, lots of violent crime without guns and not many murders, but if you have lots of guns and lots of violence together, that’s the thing that leads to lots of murders.