March 12, 2025

THE DRAGON HAS NO TEETH:

The End of the Chinese Dream (Yi Fuxian, Mar. 10th, 2025, Project Syndicate)

Back in 2016, I told the New York Times that China’s aging population and shrinking labor force would prevent its economy from overtaking America’s – a conclusion I had arrived at in the 2007 and 2013 editions of my book Big Country with an Empty Nest. Chinese authorities were not happy. I immediately went from being a state guest to a name on the government’s blacklist. Then, in 2019, I angered the authorities again by publishing a commentary bearing the headline: “Worse than Japan: how China’s looming demographic crisis will doom its economic dream.”

According to the dominant narrative at the time, the “Chinese century” was “well under way” (as The Economist put it). Nonetheless, my findings met with a receptive audience. In the introduction to a November 2020 Brookings Institution book on “the future of US policy toward China,” my commentary was the sole reference listed. (The author, Jeffrey Bader, had been one of the principal architects of the Obama administration’s “pivot to Asia.”) Since then, the dominant narrative has shifted, with many more analysts warning of China’s “Japanification.”

Japan’s experience has confirmed that demographics matter for economic growth, and this will remain the case regardless of whether one looks at Germany, France, China, or any other country. Owing to a rapidly growing workforce and a young population, Japan’s GDP grew from a mere 9% of US GDP in 1960 to 73% in 1995, and its per capita GDP grew from 17% of America’s to 154% in the same period. By 1990, Americans had come to regard Japan as their chief rival, with polls showing that three times more Americans feared the economic threat posed by Japan than the military one posed by the Soviet Union.

Yet Japan’s GDP growth rate has been lower than America’s since 1992.

Fear of a rising China is just a function of Sinophobia.

WHITER BUT POORER!:

Trump to Wall Street: Brace for Impact (Peter Coy, 03.11.25, Free Press)

[S]tock prices have fallen at least in part because investors are coming to the painful realization that Trump doesn’t seem to care so much for them anymore. In his first term, Trump viewed the market as his personal scorecard. Now? “You can’t really watch the stock market,” he told Maria Bartiromo on Sunday.

With the market nearing correction territory—defined as a 10 percent drop—since its mid-February peak, I asked Mohamed El-Erian, the bond whiz who is now president of Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, whether this realization was part of the reason stocks had fallen over the past month. He agreed. The steadfast belief that Trump would do whatever it took to keep the stock market happy was termed “the Trump put.” (A put is a derivative that protects its owner from price declines.)

Confidence in the Trump put began to erode when Trump and his economic team started talking about bond yields, rather than stock prices, as their metric of choice, El-Erian said. (Bonds can do well even if stocks are doing poorly.)

Even before this past weekend, the market had been falling, partly thanks to the specter of high tariffs. But then, over the weekend, Trump and others on his team seemed to say that even a recession would not cause the administration to pull back from its tariff strategy.

And because the tariffs could lead not only to slower economic growth but also higher inflation—stagflation, it’s called—investors can’t count on the Federal Reserve to bail them out as it has in the past, El-Erian told me. (That’s called “the Fed put” on Wall Street.) The Fed will hardly be eager to cut interest rates aggressively if tariffs are pushing up prices, he said.

Stocks rose after Trump was elected because investors were looking forward to deregulation and tax cuts. Yes, they assumed that Trump might use the threat of tariffs to gain concessions from trading partners. But he surely wouldn’t be so foolish as to erect high and long-lasting tariff walls. Instead, El-Erian said, “The things that the market really likes haven’t come yet,” and the thing the market doesn’t like—tariffs—are turning out to be more than just tactical threats.

Destroying the economy makes America less attractive to immigrants. The nihilism is intentional.