July 5, 2026

NOMAN IS [NOT] AN ISLAND(ER):

The 25-year odyssey to prove Homer’s kingdom was not an island (Emily Prescott, July 04 2026, Times uk)


So Bittlestone spent an afternoon and evening in Diggle’s college rooms laying out his theory. By midnight Diggle asked to sleep on it. “By the next morning, I was able to email him and say, ‘I slept on this and this is absolutely brilliant and we must pursue it.’”

Bittlestone had noticed that Homer’s highly detailed geographic descriptions in the Odyssey could not be reconciled with modern-day Ithaki. For instance, Homer states that Ithaca was the furthest west of three islands and the furthest out to sea. Modern Ithaki is the closest to the Greek mainland and the furthest east.


Homer describes Odysseus’s home as low-lying. Modern Ithaki is mountainous.

Bittlestone argued that the Paliki peninsula on the next-door island of Kefalonia perfectly matched Homer’s descriptions. It faces the sea, is the furthest west, and is low-lying. There was only one problem: Paliki is a peninsula, and everyone “knew” Ithaca was an island.


To solve this, Bittlestone theorised that during the Late Bronze Age, around 1200 BC — the era of the Trojan War — Paliki was separated from the rest of Kefalonia by a marine channel. Because Kefalonia sits directly over two tectonic plates, Bittlestone suggested that massive earthquake-induced rockfalls had eventually filled the channel in, turning the island into a peninsula.

Next Bittlestone approached Professor John Underhill, a geoscientist. Underhill said: “Robert called me and started the conversation by saying: ‘I’m not a crank,’ and when you hear that you think: ‘Oh my word …’ He’d found my PhD based on the geology of western Greece via Google and introduced me to the project.”

CITY LIGHT LAY OUT:

Give Me One Season to Play Here: Tracy Chapman’s Year on the Soccer Field: Before the Grammys and global fame, the singer-songwriter spent a college season on the field—just as women’s soccer was finding its footing—and left her teammates speechless when she finally sang. (Jonathan Williamson, Jul 01, 2026, Narratively)

Bill Gehling: She would have just signed up and said she was interested in trying out. We would have run three or four or five days of tryouts. And she had to beat out the others in the pool.

Jen Luscher: Even though nobody was cut, we still had tryouts. Not enough players back then.

Nicole Crepeau: Tracy and I were fabulously unskilled coming in as players, but athletic.

Lynn Roth: Tracy had that great speed, but she could have used a few more foot skills.

Bill Gehling: She came in and she was a fantastic athlete, super strong, super fast. Limited soccer skills at the time. But that was not rare, right? Most players in the team were relatively limited in the soccer skill area. But she was competitive. She was tough.

Heather Sibbison: We were doing these drills and I remember thinking, “Wow, she is really fast.” She, effortlessly, kicked my ass in a sprint drill.

Nicole Crepeau: She just blew us all away.

Bill Gehling: She played forward for us.

Lisa Raffin: I played the middle of the field and she played on the right side. I could feed her the ball down the line and she would streak and then be able to cross the ball back, feed it back in. I remember being like, “Wow. I could never do that.”

Heather Sibbison: I can’t remember her ever yelling on the field, or talking much. She was very quiet. But very positive on the field and on the bench as well.

Bill Gehling: She was an exceptional athlete, but just a solid soccer player. She was tough. She was aggressive. But off the field, she was as sweet of a person as you would ever see.

SOLITUDE IS NOT A MIRACLE:

The Incredible Buddha Boy: A legend is growing in Nepal, where people say a meditating boy hasn’t eaten or drunk in seven months. He barely moves, just sits under a tree, still as a stone. It’s impossible, some say. Is it a miracle? A hoax? George Saunders went to find out. (George Saunders, May 7, 2006, GQ)

Austrian Airlines is big on hot rolls. Red-clad flight attendants continually tout their hot rolls in the accents of many nations, including, one feels, nations that haven’t actually been founded yet. (“Hod roolz?” “Hat rahls?” “Hoot rowls?”) The in-flight safety video is troubling: It’s animated and features a Sims-like guy with what looks like a skinless, skeletal death’s-head who keeps turning to leer at a slim Sims lady who keeps looking away, alarmed, while trying to get her long legs tucked away somewhere so Death can’t see them. Later she slides down the emergency slide, holding a Sims baby, Death still pursuing her.

Ancient Mariner-style, my seatmate, a Kosovar, tells me about a Serbian paramilitary group called the Black Hand that left a childhood friend of his on a hillside, “cut into tiny pieces.” During the occupation, he says, the Serbs often killed babies in front of their parents. He is kindly, polite, awed by the horrible things he’s seen, grateful that, as an American citizen, he no longer has to worry about murdered babies or hacked-up friends, except, it would appear, in memory, constantly.

Story told, he goes off to sleep.

But I can’t. I’m too uncomfortable. I’m mad at myself for eating two roolz during the last Round of Roolz, roolz that seem to have instantaneously made my pants tighter. I’ve already read all my books and magazines, already stood looking out the little window in the flight-attendant area, already complimented a severe blond flight attendant on Austrian Airlines’ excellent service, which elicited an oddly Austrian reaction: She immediately seemed to find me reprehensible and weak.

On the bright side, only six more hours on this plane, then two hours in the Vienna airport and an eight-hour flight to Katmandu.

I decide to close my eyes and sit motionless, to make the time pass.

Somebody slides up their window shade and, feeling the change in light on my eyelids, I am filled with sudden curiosity: Has the shade really been lifted? By someone? Gosh, who was it? What did they look like? What were they trying to accomplish by lifting the shade? I badly want to open my eyes and confirm that a shade has indeed been lifted, by someone, for some purpose. Then I notice a sore patch on the tip of my tongue and feel a strong desire to interrupt my experiment to record the interesting sore-tongue observation in my notebook. Then I begin having Restless Leg Syndrome, Restless Arm Syndrome, and even a little Restless Neck Syndrome. Gosh, am I thirsty. Boy, is my breath going to be bad when this stupid experiment is over. I imagine a waterfall of minty water flowing into my mouth, a waterfall that does not have to be requested via the stern flight attendant but just comes on automatically when I press a button on the overhead console marked MINTY WATER.

The mind is a machine that is constantly asking: What would I prefer? Close your eyes, refuse to move, and watch what your mind does. What it does is become discontent with that-which-is. A desire arises, you satisfy that desire, and another arises in its place. This wanting and rewanting is an endless cycle for which, turns out, there is already a name: samsara. Samsara is at the heart of the vast human carnival: greed, neurosis, mad ambition, adultery, crimes of passion, the hacking to death of a terrified man on a hillside in the name of A More Pure and Thus Perfect Nation—and all of this takes place because we believe we will be made happy once our desires have been satisfied.

I know this. But still I’m full of desire. I want my legs to stop hurting. I want something to drink. I even kind of want another hot roll.

Seven months, I think? The kid has been sitting there seven months?

BACK TO THE THIRD WAY:

Labour can be a party of growth – but not like this: Andy Burnham should focus less on how wealth is shared and start asking why it isn’t being created (Roger Partridge, 30 June 2026, CapX)

If growth cannot be commanded from above, the cure for Britain’s cost-of-living crisis is not to pull energy, water and transport back under public control. A centre that cannot create growth should surrender the levers, not seize more of them. The road Burnham should follow leads somewhere British Labour has spent forty years refusing to look: to a Labour government that began with the failure of central control and did not stop halfway.

One of the most sweeping market reforms in the democratic world was not the work of Margaret Thatcher or Ronald Reagan. In 1984, New Zealand elected a Labour government facing a run on the currency and an economy strangled by controls that successive governments had built to protect workers. Its finance minister, Roger Douglas, started from Burnham’s premise and took it further: if the state could not direct growth, it had to stop pretending it could. So, Labour let the market back in, stripping out regulation, opening the country to trade, cutting subsidies and eventually selling the state’s trading arms. It did not betray Labour’s ends; it pursued them by means that could deliver them.

Unfortunately, the left–like the right–has turned on its most successful leaders: Blair and Clinton. Their central insight was that using capitalist means you could achieve socialist ends, creating ever more wealth to redistribute. Wealth creation itself has become anathema.