July 17, 2008

CYCLES DON'T BOTTOM AT TWICE THEIR NORMAL FLOOR:

The End of Oil's Boom?: A 10% correction over the past week could signal the end of a long bull run for crude oil (Moira Herbst, 7/16/08, Business Week)

Analysts say the two-day sell-off reflects the market's recognition of reduced demand in the U.S., even if longer-term trends remain bullish. Oil traders, it seems, may have finally noticed the public's reaction to high energy prices. "For a while the market heightened all bullish news and discounted anything bearish," says Joel Fingerman, president of FundamentalAnalytics.com, a Chicago-based energy consulting firm. "But people are giving up their Humvees and pickup trucks, and the market is starting to care."

Analysts say that while oil traders have been betting on surging demand from developing countries such as India and China, reduced demand in the U.S. is now sending bearish signals the markets can't ignore. Moreover, Energy Dept. data released July 16 showed a 3 million barrel jump in U.S. crude inventories, to 296.9 million barrels; analysts had expected a decline. Moreover, U.S. demand for energy products has fallen 2% from the same period last summer, according to a four-week average federal regulators release weekly. "I think this is a precursor to a much bigger sell-off," says Peter Beutel, president of Cameron Hanover, an energy risk-management firm in New Canaan, Conn. "It's very possible we have seen the worst this [price surge] is going to do to us. The tide is starting to change."

Fingerman points to the 5% drop in U.S. gasoline demand from the same time a year ago as evidence of a "structural shift in the car economy."


Betting on Oil's Return to Earth: Lehman's lonely oil contrarian, Ed Morse, says the price bubble will burst before you hear Auld Lang Syne (Steve LeVine, 7/16/08, Business Week)
Edward L. Morse, Lehman Brothers' (LEH) chief energy economist, says the oil bubble (he dubs it Oil Dot-com) will burst by New Year's. Not only that, he predicts a plunge to about $93 a barrel. Pretty audacious as prognostications go, at a time when Goldman Sachs (GS) foresees $200 a barrel. To that Morse just replies that he's the one talking sense. "We are trying to keep our heads in a wild market," he says.

Morse is the most prominent oil contrarian on Wall Street. Before joining Lehman two years ago, he taught international monetary policy at Princeton University, was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for international energy policy in the Carter Administration, co-founded consultants PFC Energy, and was publisher of Petroleum Intelligence Weekly. "He likes to be a provocateur," says Frank Verrastro, director of energy at the Center for Strategic & International Studies in Washington, who served with Morse under Carter. Morse has made bold predictions that Russian oil would weaken Saudi Arabia's predominance (bad call) and that scarce production capacity would drive prices up (bingo).

The 66-year-old Morse gives several reasons for being bearish. First, oil has long been cyclical. Why should the pendulum stop now? Second, Morse thinks China's go-for-broke industrial economy is slowing, leading to a "radical" reduction in its oil demand after the summer. Third, he foresees a big buildup in oil inventories this fall and, longer term, a greater flow of crude as new deepwater drilling rigs reach equipment-starved producers in the Gulf of Mexico. Finally, 13 million barrels a day of new refinery capacity will be available by 2013, making hard-to-process crudes more marketable.


The world isn't governed rationally, but suppose that this afternoon Democrats--who supposedly care about emissions--offered W and the GOP tax rate cuts in exchange for carbon consumption taxes. We'd be able to maintain an artificially high price of gasoline with catastrophic effects on the many vile regimes that are currently getting rich off of oil. We'd force innovation in the energy field. And we'd reduce the burden on something we want--people increasing their income--while raising the burden on that which we don't--consumption--thereby making possible and increasing personal savings.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 17, 2008 8:16 AM

The only fly in the $40/bbl oil you predict is the wholesale debauching of the currency by the class of clowns at the Fed.

Oil's price is a function of supply and demand, inflation, & speculation in some proportion that is hard to figure precisely.

Your policy prescription is exactly right. Too bad that the world is governed irrationally, and we therefore are lead by the exceedingly stupid, who are doing the exact opposite.

Posted by: Bruno at July 17, 2008 9:15 AM

They are not stupid, Bruno, they are concerned with self interest. The Democrats need all the tax money they can get to give to their constituents. And the Republicans are currently run by oil men, who also benefit from high oil prices.

Posted by: Brandon at July 17, 2008 10:27 AM

The notion that politicians are going to propose a gas tax increase in an election year when prices at the pump are pushing $5/gallon is so hilariously insane it could only come from oj.

Posted by: b at July 17, 2008 10:57 AM

Just who is this "we" who want to raise the burden on consumption?

Oh, right, OJ lives on the eastern seaboard, and doesn't travel to talk to people in the heartland. Because trains don't go there.

Posted by: ray at July 17, 2008 11:52 AM

While the spike in crude prices has several causes, commodity speculation is chief among them.
Many traders are betting ... often hedging ... on a major supply disruption. This is perfectly rational, given that the outbound shipping channel through the Straits of Hormuz is less than 2 miles wide. The only other time in the past 50 years that real-dollar crude prices were anything close to the current level was 1979. Which is to say, it's largely about US/Iranian tensions. If Bush strikes a deal on Iranian nukes, the price collapses.

Posted by: ghostcat at July 17, 2008 12:47 PM

One of the main premises of neoconomics is that by taxing consumption you can drive savings, an obvious good in aging developed societies where you want to simultaneously downsize the State.

Posted by: oj at July 17, 2008 1:34 PM

Exactly. We don't govern ourselves rationally but emotionally. There is no homo economicus.

Posted by: oj at July 17, 2008 1:36 PM

b,

A tax swap that was a tax CUT would fly politically.

You ask a typical worker whether s/he'd like to be taxed on something they HAVE control over (Gas) instead of something they have NO control over (Soc. Sec.), and most would jump at the chance.

If anything, now is the PERFECT time to do this, as the falling prices would mask the tax increase.

The drop in demand would ameliorate future spikes, as well.

Brandon,

Their "self interest" = collectively stupid policies that hurt the nation.

Introducing a competitive party to propose more rational solution would change the dynamic.

Dems & Reps have an unspoken agreement to keep themselves in power at the expense of the citizenry. It's time to destroy that dynamic.

OJ hates the idea of more parties, but a competitive alternative party or candidacy is the only way any of his pet policies get passed.

The irony!

Posted by: Bruno at July 19, 2008 11:02 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« IT DOESN'T MATTER IN THE LONG RUN...: | Main | IN WHAT PARALLEL UNIVERSE...: »