September 5, 2007
BUT THE BLAINE AMENDMENT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ANTI-CATHOLIC:
New Arab academy caught in debate of religious pluralism, war on terror (John L. Allen Jr., 9/5/2007, National Catholic Reporter)
“Only in America” may be an overused phrase, but a debate is percolating in New York these days that reflects a uniquely American confluence of religious pluralism, church/state tensions, the politics of identity and fears unleashed by the war on terror.Posted by Orrin Judd at September 5, 2007 8:05 AMAt the eye of the storm is the new Khalil Gibran International Academy in Brooklyn, which opened Sept. 4. New York already has charter schools that teach other languages, such as Spanish and Chinese, and the new academy is supported by a broad coalition of civic leaders, including clergy from various faiths and Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Yet it has been denounced as a breeding ground for Islamic radicalism by local critics, who have organized a grass-roots coalition called “Stop the Madrassa.” [...]
There are enough ironies surrounding this story to keep a battalion of cultural critics busy. Consider:
- The school’s namesake, Lebanese poet Khalil Gibran, was not a Muslim. He was baptized as a Maronite Catholic, and after his family immigrated to Boston in the 1890s and Gibran began to move in the city’s artistic circles, he declared: “I am no longer Catholic. I am a pagan.”
- The principal of the academy is a New York Jew who grew up Orthodox, a veteran educator named Danielle Salzberg, who does not speak Arabic. She became principal after the first principal, a Yemini Muslim named Debbie Almontaser, was forced to resign.
Two of the most vocal backers of the school are a rabbi, Michael Feinberg, and an African-American Baptist pastor, Rev. Clinton Miller.
This is so far over the edge of crazy, no comment is possible.
Posted by: erp at September 5, 2007 11:38 AMerp,
This is how the monopoly destroys the popularity of charter schools in the minds of the electorate.
A charter plan calling for a quality, non-sectarian curricula (Look up KIPP or CORE Knowledge) would become popular.
This school (though I still defend any and all competition to the public monopoly) was chosen for the specific reason that it is controversial.
This is by design. Public School Monopolists are diabolical in their drive to kill any and all reforms.
Posted by: Bruno at September 5, 2007 12:15 PMSuch a charter school would be a useless replication of the public schools.
Posted by: oj at September 5, 2007 2:55 PMAlthough the Khalil Gibran International Academy is not a charter school, it is a reminder that charter schools, like public schools, can endorse a culture and can accommodate religion. Charter schools, like public schools, cannot endorse religion. Only time will tell whether the Academy crosses the line. For further information see Religious Charter Schools: Legalities and Practicalities by Lawrence D. Weinberg.
Posted by: Lawrence Weinberg at September 5, 2007 8:37 PMEndorsement isn't an unconstitutional standard. Establishment is, though not by a school.
Posted by: oj at September 5, 2007 11:06 PMDo they play dodgeball and Red Rover and King of the hill at recess?
Posted by: ratbert at September 6, 2007 12:07 AM