January 30, 2007
OBLIGATORY HITLER REFERENCE:
Bush's three-front blunder (Gareth Porter, 1/31/07, Asia Times)
US President George W Bush's State of the Union address appears to confirm other indications in recent weeks that he is not merely sending more troops to Iraq to do more of the same, but has adopted a new strategy of fighting all three major Iraqi Arab political-military forces simultaneously. [...]One veteran military expert on Iraq, retired US Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor, said Bush's new policy is a "war against all" in Iraq and called it "a blunder of Hitlerian proportions".
The difference, obviously, being that FDR and America had little trouble winning a multi-front war. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 30, 2007 7:46 AM
But they had the will to win.
Posted by: Sandy P at January 30, 2007 10:44 AMDid Macgregor serve in the German Army?
He must get his information exclusively from CNN.
Posted by: ratbert at January 30, 2007 10:55 AMDid Macgregor serve in the German Army?
He must get his information exclusively from CNN.
Posted by: ratbert at January 30, 2007 10:56 AMThose places over there are not nation-states as we think of them. They do things differently over in the jailhouse. Attempting to force their realities into our familiar categories simply doesn't work.
It looks as though wee are fighting everybody at once because everybody there is out of phase with our categories of how a state is supposed to work.
We're making them typical nation states--that's the point of the exercise.
Posted by: oj at January 30, 2007 11:39 AMIt isn't the number of fronts. It's the number of objectives. If all the fronts serve the same objective, that's one thing. If they serve different objectives, you have a problem.
Posted by: Bob Hawkins at January 30, 2007 12:13 PMOj: That's part of what most of us mean by reformation. The problem we face now is that the enemies domestic are hampering us from completing the reformation of the enemies foreign.
The folk-enemies and culture-traitors are so intent on not just discrediting Bush but discrediting conservatism and Christianity, that they are making peaceful reformation impossible.
Because of our strategic interests in the region and because of our hostage, Israel, we cannot just walk away. So once again, the peace-creeps will cause world war, bringing Armageddon, and once more bear blood-guily for the deaths of millions.
Posted by: Lou Gots at January 30, 2007 5:02 PM
The domestic scene doesn't matter. Having unleashed the Shi'a they're creating nations post-haste. Democrats can't stop them.
Posted by: oj at January 30, 2007 6:08 PMLou is right, we obviously have interests in the Middle East, mostly oil induced globalization.
We invaded to setup an ally thereby strengthening our ability to protect that interest. We called it WMD hunt, then WoT, and finally nation building but in the end they were all just pretext to as Fukuyama said, hitting them with a baseball bat to see what happens.
Well now we don't quite have an ally and we have a lot of Shia and Sunni running around blowing things up. But we may still get an ally and it may or may not be a Shia theocracy and it may or may not be a populat government.
We may still win by losing as we have in Vietnam because what comes out of Iraq over the next 20 years will likely be a much stronger ally than the one we tried to setup.
Our actions in Iraq will likely keep us strong for another century. It took either an idiot or a genius in President Bush to take the action, I don't know which but I don't think it matters.
We don't need allies. The people of the Middle East need their own coherent nations. Alliances will follow.
Posted by: oj at January 31, 2007 8:03 AMTrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference OBLIGATORY HITLER REFERENCE::
» Bush’s climate-change plans fall short with critics from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
It was progress, of sorts. Tuesday in his State of the Union address, President Bush got his lips ar [Read More]
