December 10, 2006

THERE'S A NAME FOR A CITY CONTROLLED BY THE ENEMY--GROUND ZERO:

Extended Occupation Helps U.S. in Ramadi (WILL WEISSERT, 12/08/06, The Associated Press)

The soldiers swallow diet pills and slurp can after can of Red Bull, fighting to stay awake as they peer from armored Humvees into the pre-dawn darkness. Twangy country music pours from some vehicle sound systems, angry rap from others.

Every few minutes, an explosion is heard, but it's only the Marines blowing down doors as they storm from house to house, searching for sniper rifles, bomb-making materials and suspected insurgents.

"Operation Squeeze Play" is proving easier than expected considering this 20-block section of southeastern Ramadi _ known as "Second Officer's District" because it's home to so many former leaders of Saddam Hussein's army _ was not so long ago a no-go zone for U.S. troops.

"You used to look at a map and it'd be like the Columbus-era, 'South of here lies dragons,' because nobody ever went there," said Capt. Jon Paul Hart, assistant operations officer for the Army's 1st Battalion, 37th Armored Regiment. "All we knew was that it was really bad, really dangerous."

Ramadi, the capital of the western, overwhelming Sunni Arab province of al-Anbar, has seen some of the bloodiest street battles of the war. Sunni insurgents remain well-entrenched here and continue to move freely through parts of downtown where Americans often dare not set foot.

At least six U.S. troops were killed in fierce fighting in the province on Wednesday, the military said.

But as the White House faces calls to revisit its Iraq policy, U.S. forces in Ramadi insist their strategy here _ taking ground and holding it _ is proving effective.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 10, 2006 9:00 PM
Comments

I think statements confirming the essential need for ground troops to hold land and provide security proves that we needed more ground troops in the initial stages of the occupation. Had we been able to provide order and eliminate troublemakers at the start, chances are Iraq would be much more stable now and that we might have been able to withdraw the troops safely.

But that train has long since left the station - a substantial increase in troops now would create new anxieties as well.

Posted by: Chris Durnell at December 11, 2006 12:04 PM
« THEY NEED TURKEY MORE THAN THE TURKS NEED THE EUROPE: | Main | CONFUSING A PAPER WALL FOR AN IRON CURTAIN AGAIN: »