July 28, 2006

DUDE'S GOT ISSUES:

Army Dismisses Gay Arabic Linguist (DUNCAN MANSFIELD, 7/28/06, Associated Press)

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 28, 2006 4:14 PM
Comments

Any theories on why all the linguists seem to be gay?

Posted by: RC at July 28, 2006 5:08 PM

There's only one reason soldiers learn languages, and in the middle east it doesn't work for the straight guys.

Posted by: David Cohen at July 28, 2006 5:11 PM

"DUD'S GOT ISSUES" -

Who cares about his clothing???

Posted by: obc at July 28, 2006 5:46 PM

All the linguists aren't gay. The queers make a big deal about the ones who are to advance their agenda by pointing to a few cases of homosexual Arabic translators on the theory that the public will find the needs of the GWOT to outweigh the mos maiorum.

Posted by: Lou Gots at July 28, 2006 7:40 PM

The NSA and CIA are looking for cunning linguists also, even if the US military isn't.

Posted by: Pete at July 28, 2006 8:29 PM

This was pretty unfair though. By all accounts he was doing his job well and his service record shows that he was a good soldier. He was holding up his end of 'don't ask, don't tell', his sexuality was kept strictly separate from his work and no one knew he was gay. Considering the number of conservative armchair warriors (including myself) who endorse this war without doing a thing personally to help it, chucking this poor guy out is pretty rich.

For the army to allow some anonymous scumbag to throw him out of his job by an email campaign is ugly and unjust, and it throws the whole DADT policy into disrepute. DADT is a two way street, if he agrees not to tell the army agrees not to ask. It’s the army who broke faith here.

Posted by: Amos at July 29, 2006 12:49 AM

Is it possible that his homosexuality was only an excuse for dismissing him because of his biased, perhaps muslim, mistranslations?

Posted by: jd watson at July 29, 2006 6:26 AM

He's gay.

Posted by: oj at July 29, 2006 8:02 AM

If the Arabs were alligned with us vs the Turks he'd still have a job. A regular T.E. Lawrence, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at July 29, 2006 11:34 AM

There's absolutely no proof that Lawrence was a homosexual. I read the musings of one psychologist who thought that Lawrence was so adverse to human touch that it was likely he had no sexual impulse whatsoever.

Posted by: Dreadnought at July 29, 2006 1:17 PM

dread:

Try reading Lawrence. If he wasn't buggering Arab boys he was certainly besotted with them.

Posted by: oj at July 29, 2006 3:28 PM

dread: Haven't you noticed that everyone in the past was gay? Of course, thanks to the left, no one in the future will be.

Posted by: David Cohen at July 29, 2006 5:59 PM
« SURELY THERE'S NO ONE DELUDED ENOUGH.... | Main | THE MILITARY WOULD BE A BARGAIN IF THIS WAS ALL IT DID (Via Ann Althouse) »