May 24, 2006

NOT NOW, BUDDY, AMERICAN IDOL IS ON

The Cold Wars are coming (Niall Ferguson, Los Angeles Times, May 24th, 2006)

Why does it suddenly seem so hard to stop Iran from going nuclear? Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is behaving with such recklessness that it ought to be easy. In October, he called for Israel to be "wiped off the map". It is, he told cheering Indonesian students last week, a "tyrannical regime that one day will be destroyed." Simultaneously, Ahmadinejad has trumpeted Iran's "right" to pursue its nuclear ambitions, barely disguising his country's intention to move from energy into weaponry.

Yet the West -- what's left of it --seems paralyzed, watching Ahmadinejad with the same appalled fascination that a large and docile cow might regard a rearing cobra.

It is, of course, always dangerous to draw analogies with the 1930s. Too many bad decisions have been made over the years on the basis of facile parallels -- between Hitler and Nasser, between Hitler and Saddam Hussein. Still, in one respect, Ahmadinejad really has taken a leaf out of the Füührer's book. He has discovered the counterintuitive truth that it works to talk aggressively before you have acquired weapons of mass destruction.

The key is that weak opponents are unnerved when they fear they are dealing with a madman. In this respect, the long and nutty letter sent by Ahmadinejad to President Bush last week was exemplary, with its repeated references to "the prophet ... Jesus Christ (PBUH)" (Peace Be Upon Him).

Four years ago, George W. Bush would have trash-canned such drivel with a snort of "WBUH" (War Be Upon Him). But those days are gone. Bush is now almost as unpopular as Richard Nixon or Jimmy Carter at the nadirs of their political fortunes. Not only is domestic support lacking for any preemptive action against Tehran, international support is close to nonexistent.

In short, it seems highly probable that nothing will be done this year, next year or the year after to stop Iran's nuclear program. Sure, maybe a miracle will happen and the Iranian people will get rid of the madman and the mullahs. But I'm not holding my breath.

Perhaps we can have a contest here. Complete the following sentence: “The world is going to stand by and watch Iran acquire nuclear weapons because...”

Posted by Peter Burnet at May 24, 2006 1:46 PM
Comments

Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding. (Batman Begins)

Posted by: Matt Cohen at May 24, 2006 2:06 PM

Because the world's done stupider things before, and gotten away with them.

Posted by: joe shropshire at May 24, 2006 2:07 PM

America has been and will be the enemy.

The world needs "balance."

The world prefers to live under dictators and thugs.

Posted by: Sandy P at May 24, 2006 2:07 PM

...because Israel will handle it and the USA will defend Israel. We'll give them the right tools for the job as well.

Posted by: I-RIGHT-I at May 24, 2006 2:20 PM

Me 2-RIGHT-2

Posted by: erp at May 24, 2006 2:25 PM

...that's what the media wants, and what the media wants the media gets" (if only in their own minds).

Did everyone know the president has low poll numbers? I was shocked to discover this. They really need to get this out more.

Posted by: BJW at May 24, 2006 2:44 PM

..by 2020 or whenever it gets them it will be an ally.

Posted by: oj at May 24, 2006 3:13 PM

...the world always stands by and watches until it is too late.

The 2003 Battle of - not War in - Iraq is (almost) an anomaly.

Posted by: Rick T. at May 24, 2006 4:19 PM

Tradition!

Posted by: David Cohen at May 24, 2006 5:56 PM

we all evolved from spineless jellyfish, we need their oil to make diesel fuel for our trains cars, they play in the World Cup, and rather than confront them we can kill them softly.

Posted by: The Other Brother at May 24, 2006 9:50 PM

Why dosen't bush just order Iran's military destroyed? That would take what, three weeks?

What's he afraid of, that it'll reduce his chance of being reelected on '08?

Can someone here who knows much better than I how the process works tell me if Bush has the authority to order such a strike, or does he need congressional aproval?

WBUH, I like that

Posted by: Amos at May 24, 2006 10:44 PM

Peter - Your grammar is wrong, it should be "The world stood by and watched Iran acquire nuclear weapons because ..."

Amos - Bush has the authority to do whatever he likes, and get impeached for it.

Posted by: pj at May 24, 2006 11:00 PM
« GOD COMMANDED THE TIME-ZONE RULE FOR A REASON: | Main | KNEW HIM? HE'S STILL GOT REAGAN'S FOOTPRINTS ON HIS BUTT: »