April 27, 2006
PRETTY STEEP UNION DUES (via Pepys):
Unions' Advice Is Failing Teachers: Labor groups have joined forces with investment firms to steer members into savings plans that often have high expenses and poor returns. (Kathy M. Kristof, April 25, 2006, LA Times)
Some of the nation's largest teachers unions have joined forces with investment companies to steer their members into retirement plans with high expenses that eat away at returns.In what might seem an unlikely partnership, the unions endorse investment providers, even specific products, and the companies reciprocate with financial support. They sponsor union conferences, advertise in union publications or make direct payments to union treasuries.
The investment firms more than recoup their money through sales of annuities and other high-fee products to teachers for their 403(b) plans — personal retirement accounts similar to 401(k)s.
New York State United Teachers, for instance, receives $3 million a year from ING Group for encouraging its 525,000 members to invest in an annuity sold by the Dutch insurance giant.
The National Education Assn., the largest teachers union in the country with 2.7 million members, collected nearly $50 million in royalties in 2004 on the sale of annuities, life insurance and other financial products it endorses.
Teachers unions across the country — including those in Las Vegas and San Diego and statewide teacher associations in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Oregon — have struck their own endorsement deals.
Unions in Dallas, Miami, Phoenix, Seattle and Atlanta, among others, refer members to products approved by the NEA and typically receive a share of endorsement revenue in return.
Many teachers say they presume an endorsement means their union has used its clout to get the best price, as unions do on products from eyeglasses to automobiles. But when it comes to retirement accounts, union backing is often a sign that the product will cost more, not less.
Buyers of an NEA-endorsed annuity sold by Security Benefit Life Insurance Co. pay annual fees totaling at least 1.73% of their savings. That is about 10 times as much as they would pay in 403(b) plans available from Vanguard Group, T. Rowe Price and other low-cost mutual fund providers.
The costliest option in the NEA-endorsed plan charges 4.85% a year. That means an investor would have to earn a return of nearly 5% just to break even.
Union leaders defend the endorsement deals and the prevalence of high-fee annuities.
Bad enough the unions exist to benefit teachers at the expense of students, but if they can't even get that part right they're really pointless. Posted by Orrin Judd at April 27, 2006 7:54 PM
Since when have unions been for the benefit of the members instead of the union officers?
Posted by: ray at April 27, 2006 8:34 PMDang it, ray, I wanted to write that!
My view is that unions made the shift from benefiting members to benefiting officers as a consequence of so much of what used to be union negotiating efforts turned in to legislation. Once good working conditions were a matter of law rather than union strength, the leadership could indulge itself instead of concerning themselves with the membership.
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at April 27, 2006 8:47 PMSince when have corporations been for the benefit of the stockholders instead of the corporate officers?
Since when have politics been for the benefit of the voters instead of the politcians?
Since when have [group] been for the benefit of [members] instead of [leaders]? (Insert blanks)
This is called human nature.
Posted by: Gideon at April 27, 2006 11:11 PMGid, you're right. That's why he/she who governs least, governs best, but our kids education is far too important to be flippant about. It's coming on to the third generation of kids being brain washed by the teachers unions. Gotta stop them.
Posted by: erp at April 29, 2006 8:03 AM