March 18, 2006
WELCOME SALON TO THE VRWC:
Cited as Symbol of Abu Ghraib, Man Admits He Is Not in Photo (KATE ZERNIKE, 3/18/06, NY Times)
In the summer of 2004, a group of former detainees of Abu Ghraib prison filed a lawsuit claiming that they had been the victims of the abuse captured in photographs that incited outrage around the world.One, Ali Shalal Qaissi, soon emerged as their chief representative, appearing in publications and on television in several countries to detail his suffering. His prominence made sense, because he claimed to be the man in the photograph that had become the international icon of the Abu Ghraib scandal: standing on a cardboard box, hooded, with wires attached to his outstretched arms. He had even emblazoned the silhouette of that image on business cards.
The trouble was, the man in the photograph was not Mr. Qaissi. [Editors' Note, Page A2.]
Military investigators had identified the man on the box as a different detainee who had described the episode in a sworn statement immediately after the photographs were discovered in January 2004, but then the man seemed to go silent.
Mr. Qaissi had energetically filled the void, traveling abroad with slide shows to argue that abuse in Iraq continued, as head of a group he called the Association of Victims of American Occupation Prisons.
The New York Times profiled him last Saturday in a front-page article; in it, Mr. Qaissi insisted he had never sought the fame of his iconic status. Mr. Qaissi had been interviewed on a number of earlier occasions, including by PBS's "Now," Vanity Fair, Der Spiegel and in the Italian news media as the man on the box.
This week, after the online magazine Salon raised questions about the identity of the man in the photograph, Mr. Qaissi and his lawyers insisted he was telling the truth.
Imagine the Times of sixty years ago trying to make a martyr of a Nazi POW? Posted by Orrin Judd at March 18, 2006 8:27 AM
Read and chuckle.
Posted by: David Cohen at March 18, 2006 9:08 AM"Imagine the Times of sixty years ago trying to make a martyr of a Nazi POW?"
Not as hard to imagine as it used to be.
Posted by: Rick T. at March 18, 2006 9:53 AMOr imagine that someone would come forward to proudly proclaim they were the anonymous Nazi in a such a photo, and that is all it would take to elevate them to iconic hero-victim status, someone who, like Cindy Sheehan, is able to critically speak ex cathedra on the subject of the war.
Another story that was too good to fact-check. I wonder if Mary Mapes helped lead the Times to the fradulent torture victim?
Posted by: John at March 18, 2006 11:55 AM"Yes, I am the guard in the photographs that the US Army was so roughly treating as they disarmed me and led me away. What about the stacked corpses? I didn't tell them not to eat. Wait, what's that rope...oh, dang."
I wish it would be so plainly said.
Posted by: Mikey at March 18, 2006 4:25 PMthey would have gotten around to it eventually, after they finished glorifying the cccp.
Posted by: toe at March 18, 2006 4:31 PM