March 18, 2006

THE OPEN SOCIEY IS BEHIND THE WALL:

How I Learned to Love the Wall (IRSHAD MANJI, 3/18/06, NY Times)

I appreciate that Israel's intent is not to keep Palestinians "in" so much as to keep suicide bombers "out." But in the minds of many Palestinians, Ariel Sharon never adequately acknowledged the humiliation felt by a 60-year-old Arab whose family has harvested the Holy Land for generations when she has to show her identity card to an 18-year-old Ethiopian immigrant in an Israeli Army uniform who's been in the country for eight months. In that context, fences and walls come off as cruelly gratuitous.

For all the closings, however, Israel is open enough to tolerate lawsuits by civil society groups who despise every mile of the barrier. Mr. Sharon himself agreed to reroute sections of it when the Israel High Court ruled in favor of the complainants. Where else in the Middle East can Arabs and Jews work together so visibly to contest, and change, state policies?

I reflected on this question as I observed an Israeli Army jeep patrol the gap in Abu Dis. The vehicle was crammed with soldiers who, in turn, observed me filming the anti-Israel graffiti scrawled by Western activists — "Scotland hates the blood-sucking Zionists!" I turned my video camera on the soldiers. Nobody ordered me to shut it off or show the tape. My Arab taxi driver stood by, unprotected by a diplomatic license plate or press banner.

Like all Muslims, I look forward to the day when neither the jeep nor the wall is in Abu Dis. So will we tell the self-appointed martyrs of Islam that the people — not just Arabs, but Arabs and Jews — "are one"? That before the barrier, there was the bomber? And that the barrier can be dismantled, but the bomber's victims are gone forever?

Young Muslims, especially those privileged with a good education, cannot walk away from these questions as my interlocutor in Abu Dis did. If we follow in his footsteps, we are only conspiring against ourselves. After all, once the election is over, we won't have Ariel Sharon to kick around anymore.

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 18, 2006 8:30 AM
Comments

Go ahead, kick him around. He doesn't care any less now than he ever did.

Posted by: David Cohen at March 18, 2006 9:06 AM

What to make of this short article. The wall was built to provide safety to Israeli citizens because Arabs can or will not stop the indiscriminate killing by suicide bombers. Instead of praising them as martyrs had the good citizens condemned them, there would be no need for a wall.

If it's baffling to me that people in Scotland feel the need to go to the Middle East to scrawl anti-Israeli epithets on walls and that people in our universities scrawl anti-Israeli slogans on their campus walls, what sense can even educated Moslems like this author make of it, except to erroneously believe that support for them is far more widespread than it really is.

Posted by: erp at March 18, 2006 10:32 AM

erp, I think he said all that. If I can translate.
"This wall wouldn't be here if there had been no bombers. Their women and children were killed, so they walled you out. Surprised?"

Posted by: Mikey at March 18, 2006 4:20 PM
« WELCOME SALON TO THE VRWC: | Main | PERCEIVED?: »