February 4, 2006

FOR THE SPECIES THAT RECYCLETH SHALL KNOW EVERLASTING LIFE

Gaia and global warming (Boris Johnson, The Spectator, February 4th, 2006)

I feel I cannot possibly disagree with Lovelock, or with the overwhelming body of scientists who attest to the reality of climate change. I am sure that they are, in some sense, right; and it feels instinctively true that we are a nasty, over-polluting species; and there is something horrifying, when you look at those pictures of the world at night, to see the phosphorescent sprawl of humanity.

But the more one listens to sacerdotal figures such as Lovelock, and the more one studies public reactions to his prophecies, the clearer it is that we are not just dealing with science (though science is a large part of it); this is partly a religious phenomenon.

Humanity has largely lost its fear of hellfire, and yet we still hunger for a structure, a point, an eschatology, a moral counterbalance to our growing prosperity. All that is brilliantly supplied by climate change. Like all the best religions, fear of climate change satisfies our need for guilt, and self-disgust, and that eternal human sense that technological progress must be punished by the gods.

And the fear of climate change is like a religion in this vital sense, that it is veiled in mystery, and you can never tell whether your acts of propitiation or atonement have been in any way successful. One sect says we must build more windfarms, and these high priests will be displeased with what Lovelock has to say. Another priestly caste curses the Government's obsession with nuclear power - a programme Lovelock has had the courage to support.

Some scientific hierophants now tell us that trees - trees, the good guys - are the source of too much methane, and are contributing to global warming. Huh? We in the poor muddled laity scratch our heads and pray. Who is right? Who is wrong?

If Lovelock is only half-right, then we must have an immediate programme to pastoralise the global economy and reduce emissions. The paradox is that, if he is completely right, there is not a lot we can do, and we might as well enjoy our beautiful planet while we can.

Or is he completely wrong? To say that would be an offence not just against science, but against a growing world religion.

Which is why we here at Brothersjudd are pleased to announce the launch of our campaign to keep all talk of climate change out of the nation’s science classes.

Posted by Peter Burnet at February 4, 2006 6:11 AM
Comments

I think those night time satellite pictures are beautiful.

Posted by: David Cohen at February 4, 2006 9:16 AM

I suggest we discuss the benefits of Global Warming. Chicago has had cooler summers and warmer winters in the last 5 years.

GLOBAL WARMING - GET BEHIND IT!

Posted by: Bruno at February 4, 2006 9:59 AM

"...we are a nasty, over-polluting species; and there is something horrifying, when you look at those pictures of the world at night, to see the phosphorescent sprawl of humanity. "

Whoa, that's good misanthropy! Does he know the guy that came up with the 50 Most Loathsome People list? I think they'd get along great.

Posted by: Bryan at February 4, 2006 10:07 AM

"there is something horrifying, when you look at those pictures of the world at night, to see the phosphorescent sprawl of humanity."

If you look at those pictures, there is a black spot between Japan and China. That is North Korea.

Perhaps he should move there.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 4, 2006 1:05 PM

"Billions will die," says Lovelock, who tells us that he is not normally a gloomy type. Human civilisation will be reduced to a "broken rabble ruled by brutal warlords", and the plague-ridden remainder of the species will flee the cracked and broken earth to the Arctic, the last temperate spot, where a few breeding couples will survive.

Uh-huh.

Posted by: Matt Murphy at February 4, 2006 2:49 PM

Are we on about the "few breeding couples" again? This guy is more in need of a sex life than any other white man I know. Robert Schwartz: the spookiest thing I've ever seen was East Berlin, by night, in 1990, when the Wall had come down but the no-man's-land hadn't been filled in yet. You could go to the Potsdamer Platz, which was lit up like the strip in Vegas, and look across at row on row of concrete hulks with not a light in any window.

Posted by: joe shropshire at February 4, 2006 3:07 PM

C.S. Lewis really had this guy's number in "That Hideous Strength."

The picture of North Korea is most indicative of what is and is not going on there. At least when we follow Curtis LeMay's prescription we won't have that far to go.

Posted by: Lou Gots at February 4, 2006 6:04 PM

Joe:

You and I were in East Berlin at nearly the same time.

I, just before the fall, and you just after.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at February 4, 2006 7:00 PM
« HEAVY HANGS THE HEAD THAT WEARS THE CROWN (Via Think of England) | Main | IRRESISTIBLE FORCE MEETS IMMOVABLE OBJECT »