November 20, 2005

ONE DANG QUAGMIRE AFTER ANOTHER:

President Addresses Troops at Osan Air Base in Osan, Korea (Osan Air Base Osan, Republic of Korea, 11/19/05)

For half a century American servicemen and women have stood faithful and vigilant watch here in Korea. You've kept the peace and you secured the freedom won at great cost in the Korean War. You've ensured that no American life was lost in vain. In five decades, since Task Force Smith first landed at Pusan, the world has watched America's steadfast and unwavering commitment to freedom.

Three years of war made America and Korea enduring allies in the struggle for liberty. And five decades of sacrifice by the men and women of our Armed Forces secured peace and democracy on this peninsula. And the world is better off for it. Your courage has brought stability to the region, freedom to millions, and honor to the uniform. Our nation is grateful for your service -- your service for freedom and peace. (Applause.)

The Republic of Korea is now a beacon of liberty that shines across the most heavily armed border in the world. It is a light reaching to a land shrouded in darkness. Together the United States and the Republic of Korea have shown that the future belongs to freedom and one day, all Koreans will enjoy the blessings of freedom. (Applause.) [...]

For decades, America's Armed Forces abroad have essentially remained where the wars of the last century ended in Europe and in Asia. So more than three years ago, we launched a comprehensive review of America's global force posture -- the numbers and types and locations and capability of our forces around the world.

We're transforming our military. Over the coming decade, we'll take advantage of 21st century military technologies so we can deploy rapidly, with increased combat power. This will help improve the lives of our military and their families, because more of our troops will be stationed and deployed for home. And this will help us meet the threats of the 21st century. By transforming our military, we'll more be able to do our duty to protect the American people.

As South Korea has grown more free and prosperous, it's built an increasingly capable military that is now ready to assume a larger role in defending its people. By assuming some responsibilities that have traditionally been shouldered by American forces, South Korea will strengthen the deterrent on the Korean Peninsula and free up some of our combat forces to help us win the war on terror. [...]

[W]e're determined to deny the militants' control of any nation which they would use as a home base and a launching pad for terror.

This mission has brought new and urgent responsibilities to all who wear the uniform. American troops are fighting beside our Afghan partners against remnants of the Taliban and their al Qaeda allies. And American troops are fighting alongside courageous Iraqis against the remnants of a regime and a network of terrorists who want to stop the advance of a free Iraq. Our goal is to defeat the terrorists and allies -- and their allies at the heart of their power. And so we will defeat the enemy in Iraq.

As we pursue the terrorists, our military is helping to train Iraqi security forces so they can defend their people, and so they can fight the enemy. And we're making steady progress. With every passing month, more and more Iraqi forces are standing up, and the Iraqi military is gaining new capabilities and new confidence. At the time of our Fallujah operations a year ago, there were only a few Iraqi army battalions in combat. Today there are more than 90 Iraqi army battalions fighting the terrorists, along with our forces. American and Iraqi troops are conducting major assaults to clear out enemy fighters in Baghdad and other parts of Iraq. Iraqi police and security forces are helping clear the terrorists from their strongholds. They're holding onto areas we've cleared and are preventing the enemy from returning.

Our strategy can be summed up this way: As Iraqis stand up, we will stand down, and when our commanders on the ground tell me that Iraqi forces can defend their freedom, our troops will come home with the honor they have earned. (Applause.)

The second part of our strategy is a political strategy. Iraqis are moving forward in building a democracy. A month ago, millions of Iraqis turned out to vote for a constitution that guarantees fundamental freedoms and lays the foundation for lasting democracy. In a few weeks, Iraqis will vote again to choose a fully constitutional government to lead them for the next four years. Iraq is making amazing progress from the days of being under the thumb of a brutal dictator. Think about this: In two-and-a-half years, they've gone from tyranny to an election for a transitional government, to the ratification of a constitution, to the election of a free government. The Iraqi people are proving their determination to build a future founded on democracy and hope, and the United States of America will help them succeed. (Applause.)

The fifth element of our strategy in the war on terror is to deny the militants future recruits by replacing hatred and resentment with democracy and hope across the broader Middle East. If the Middle East is left to grow in bitterness, if countries remain in misery while radicals stir the resentments of millions, then that part of the world will be a source of endless conflict and mounting danger. If the peoples of that region are permitted to choose their own destiny, and advance by their own energy and participation as both free men and women, then the extremists will be marginalized, and the flow of violent radicalism to the rest of the world will slow and eventually end.

History has proven that free nations are peaceful nations and that democracies do not fight their neighbors. By advancing the hope of freedom and democracy for others, we'll make our own freedom more secure.

Our men and women in uniform who are serving on the Korean Peninsula have seen freedom succeed in Asia. By promoting freedom in Japan, we helped transform an enemy into a democracy that is one of the world's most prosperous nations, and one of America's most trusted allies. By standing firm against a determined enemy, we helped provide the people of South Korea with the peace and stability they needed to transform their economy and claim their own freedom. And by helping the people of Asia build successful and thriving democracies, we have helped set a hopeful example for the world. In the 21st century, we go forward with confidence because we know that freedom is the destiny of every man, woman, and child on this Earth. (Applause.)

Our work for peace and freedom involves great sacrifice by our troops. We see this sacrifice in Iraq, where our troops are hunting down the terrorists, and we're helping the Iraqi people build a working democracy. In Washington, there are some who say that the sacrifice is too great, and they urge us to set a date for withdrawal before we have completed our mission. Those who are in the fight know better. One of our top commanders in Iraq, Major General William Webster, says that setting a deadline for our withdrawal from Iraq would be, "a recipe for disaster." General Webster is right. So long as I'm the Commander-in-Chief, our strategy in Iraq will be driven by the sober judgment of our military commanders on the ground. We will fight the terrorists in Iraq. We will stay in the fight until we have achieved the brave -- the victory that our brave troops have fought for. (Applause.)

In this time of war and sacrifice, the greatest burden falls on our military families. We've lost some of our nation's finest men and women in the war on terror. Each of these men and women left grieving families and loved ones back home. Each loss of life is heartbreaking. And the best way to honor the sacrifices of our fallen troops is to complete their mission and lay the foundation of peace for our children and our grandchildren. (Applause.)

With the rise of a deadly enemy, and the unfolding of a global ideological struggle, our time in history will be remembered for new challenges and unprecedented dangers. And yet this fight we have joined is also the current expression of an ancient struggle between those who put their faith in dictators and those who put their faith in the people. Throughout history, tyrants and would-be tyrants have always claimed that murder is justified to serve their grand vision, and they end up alienating decent people across the globe. Tyrants and would-be tyrants have always claimed that regimented societies are strong and pure, until those societies collapse in corruption and decay. Tyrants and would-be tyrants have always claimed that free men and women are weak and decadent, until the day that free men and women defeat them.

We don't know the course our own struggle will take, or the sacrifices that might lie ahead. We do know, however, that the defense of freedom is worth our sacrifice. We know that the love of freedom is the mightiest force in history. And we do know the cause of freedom will once again prevail.

May God bless you all. Thank you all.


When we bring the troops home from Iraq next year it will be fifty years quicker than they came back from South Korea and sixty quicker than Japan and Germany, despite all three being functioning democracies long since.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 20, 2005 5:52 AM
Comments

Yeah, but where's his Iraq strategy?

Posted by: ghostcat at November 19, 2005 10:08 PM

"As the Iraqis stand up we will stand down"
Sounds like an exit strategy to me.

Posted by: AWW at November 19, 2005 10:20 PM

I was going for an atomic number 26 feel.

Posted by: ghostcat at November 19, 2005 10:35 PM

The Democrats want a Vietnam strategy, and no matter Murtha's military record, it is a shame he directly endorsed one this past week.

Posted by: jim hamlen at November 19, 2005 11:37 PM

End the Korean War, USA pull-out now!

Posted by: Dave W. at November 20, 2005 1:50 AM

Sorry, the near-full moon has me a little batty tonight.

Posted by: Dave W. at November 20, 2005 1:51 AM

Almost every time this subject comes up, I comment, at least to myself, but sometimes here and there publically, that no one could possible be so ignorant, so unintelligent, so like a congressional Democrat, to imagine that military presence in a client state is an all or nothing proposition.

Then, to my disappointment, the articles, the posts, the comments all come flowing back, like a black tide of mud, holding, or at least implying, that the issue in Iraq has as "exit" as if we were looking toward abandonming Iraq as we did South Viet Nam.

One more time: We do not provide our territorials with all the equipment and technology they need to have a viable armed force. It is not just spare parts, although that is a significant part of it, as Iran found out. Is involves elements of C3I that separate the two side of the modern military threshold.

One of my sons is presently on active duty on Korea; if things work out for the best, there is a fair chance that one of his sons will serve in what becomes of the former Iraq.

Posted by: Lou Gots at November 20, 2005 8:41 AM

Lou
The first question is do we presently have sufficient "technology" to protect even our own troops or Iraqi citizens adequately. Then we can move to the second question of denying Iraqi's this same "technology".

I suggest not technology, but gonads or desire are the issue for the Shiite (Kurds already do in fact have adequate amounts of both) and that our continuing presence hinders their developing or at least exercising sufficient aggressiveness.

The following link is what I am talking about.

Here is a Shiite that has the right attitude

Hassan Kadhum, smiled. "Your country had to have a civil war," he said. "It will be the same here. Everything in this world has its price. In Iraq the price for peace will be blood."


Posted by: h-man at November 20, 2005 9:54 AM

h:

Would you agree that the crux for Iraq is whether the future holds the deaths of perhaps 20,000 Sunni and foreign nutjobs (with minimal Shiite and Kurdish loss), or the deaths of 200,000 Sunni, with many casualties on the other side?

If Syria is given a dose of sunlight, the Sunnis may throw in the towel before the latter becomes likely.

Posted by: jim hamlen at November 20, 2005 10:56 AM

Jim
I don't want to give anyone here the vapors, but I'm less than overwhelmed by the Bush/Rumsfeld effort to create a multicultural or non-sectarian unified Iraqi.

I think our presence on the ground there brings with it our own peculiar domestic political correctness (Vietnam Syndrome , deja vu all over again) and that it would be better if we could shift to the Clinton/Kosovo strategy of operating at 30 thousand feet dropping bombs on Fallujah because they are "bad guys", and let the "good guys" in Shitstan (sp?) and Kurdistan handle the details on the ground. Clinton probably should have supported the Serbs, but at least he didn't disturb the American public for an unnecessary length of time.

A policy of strategic bombing in support of "freedom fighting" Shiites and Kurds is an easier sell than having roadside bombs killing American "occupiers" on a daily basis. Added benefit would be that the Sunnis would more likely sue for peace.

Posted by: h-man at November 20, 2005 11:40 AM

H, you have the "Plan B" down pat. Bush is currently working on fulfilling Plan A, since his Christianity abhors the tremendous number of lives that will be lost if A doesn't work out and we have to go with Plan B.

As for me, I applaud him---but stand by my prediction that in 20 years the world population of Muslims will be a few tens of millions less than what it is now. And if they keep it up, France will get rid of their nuclear arsenal in one fell swoop.

Posted by: ray at November 20, 2005 11:50 AM

I'm with Dave.

The grapevine has it the 8th(?) Army Command in Korea is in the planning stage for relocation to Hawaii; and in turn the Koreans are planning to reduce their forces in Iraq by 1,000 troops.

Now's an appropriate time of the year to thank Turkey for the mess we've been in with the Sunni, who should've borne the brunt of the war.

It seems timing is everything, but as usual the Democrats have it all wrong.

Posted by: Genecis at November 20, 2005 12:48 PM

h:

Sure, but that's just racial.

Posted by: oj at November 20, 2005 3:40 PM
« REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED TO HIS LAST BEST FRIEND, BABY? | Main | MAYBE ONE OF THOSE GRADS COULD CALL THE HOUSE DEMOCRATS?: »