November 11, 2005

WHEN AM FOUND?:

Lost Souls (Matt Kaufman, 11/11/05, Boundless)

There's reason to believe Christian themes are resonating with viewers — even when those themes aren't explicitly labeled as Christian.

Case in point: One of the biggest hits in many years, Lost. The series — about plane-crash survivors on a mysterious island where weird, unexplained things keep happening — gets most of its media buzz for its suspense and its eerie, sci-fi elements. And to be sure, that's captivating stuff which has helped generate a cult following. But it doesn't wholly account for its mainstream popularity (20 million-plus viewers a week). The show owes its strongest drama to stories of people haunted by the deeds (often misdeeds) of their pasts. These stories, told in weekly flashbacks, are usually tales of sin and guilt, and they're used to set up the characters' ongoing quests for redemption.

Take Kate, a fugitive from the law. She may not be at fault for her original offense (which hasn't been revealed), but she developed a deceptive and conniving side and, in a reckless escape attempt, gotten her childhood sweetheart killed. Tormented by that knowledge, she often tries to do what's right; she's brave and puts herself in danger to help someone who needs it. But at times she still lapses into lies and manipulation, most of which she finds a way to rationalize. Old habits die hard.

Take Sawyer, the sleazy con man. He started out as a victim, orphaned when his mother had a fling with a previous sleazy con man, leading his father to kill her, then commit suicide. But on his own, Sawyer grew into a mirror image of the man who victimized his family. Filled with self-loathing, he acts his worst and goes out of his way to provoke hostility and contempt, which is all he thinks he deserves. Slowly and sporadically, his conscience is moving him to reform, but he's got a long way to go.

Take Charlie, the washed-up rock star. Once a pious churchgoer who went to confession and feared corruption by the music world's temptations, he succumbed to the lure of promiscuity and drugs, and later fell to using women in schemes to raise money for his addiction. Clean and sober at the moment, he's trying to care for a fellow crash survivor (Claire) who spent most of the first season pregnant and now has a newborn to raise. But he's discovered a new stash of drugs in the wreckage of another plane, so temptation is still staring him in the face.

Take — well, pretty much all the characters, to one degree or another. Jack is a doctor who carries the weight of the world and takes every failure hard, including his broken relationship with his just-deceased dad. Michael is an absentee father trying to build a relationship with a resentful 10-year-old son. Jin and Sun are a Korean couple whose marriage deteriorated through secrets, lies and professional ambition. Sayid is a former Iraqi military officer trying to live down a history that includes torturing prisoners. They're all dealing with guilt, and while they're not all equally culpable, none is entirely innocent. And that's by design, according to series co-creator Damon Lindelof. "It feels like these people have sort of sinned in their lives before, and now, they're in an environment where they can't talk to the people that they need to talk to," he says. "They can't close the doors that they need to close."

But if sin is an ongoing element on Lost, so is the supernatural. Strange forces are at work on the island — sometimes to dark purposes, but other times to benevolent ends.

The best example is the character of John Locke. (Yes, history buffs, that's his name). Previously, he was crippled, physically (confined to a wheelchair) and emotionally (callously exploited by a birth father he met late in life). On the island, he was miraculously healed. Now he's developed into a wise spiritual leader and mentor, displaying a measure of peace that contrasts strikingly with everyone else's anxieties. (One character marvels to him that "I don't think I've ever seen you angry.")

Not that Locke's life is easy. He clashes at times with Jack the doctor, and he explains their differences of opinion by telling Jack "you're a man of science; I'm a man of faith." Locke doesn't mean it as a boast; he's only appealing to his comrade to recognize that some supernatural agent is guiding events in ways mere humans cannot grasp. (Jack, for his part, will be taught "to let go of some really strict science dogma, given the situation in which he's living," says the actor who plays him, Matthew Fox.)

Of course, we don't know just what Locke's placing his faith in, nor for that matter does Locke know: He speaks broadly of doing what "the island" wants, but doesn't know who (or Who) is behind the island. Other characters, however, have more definite ideas. Charlie, the believer who's lost his way, finds himself seeking counsel and absolution from a kindly and faithful Christian woman named Rose. She, in turn, invites him to join her in prayer: ("Heavenly Father, we thank you. We thank you for bringing us together tonight, and we ask that you show Charlie the path.... ")

All this, to be sure, falls far short of making Lost a Christian show.


Like JJ Abrams's other show, Alias, and like X-Files, it looiks like Lost will take so long to explain itself that no one will be watching it by the time it does -- these shows would benefit greatly from having set two or three year deals that would confine them to a limited story arc -- but given the structure of the narrative it will be a real cop out if the point of the island isn't too afford the characters a chance at redemption, whether in a religious sense or not.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 11, 2005 3:42 PM
Comments

Never seen the TV series, but the description sounds like what a focus group of consumers would come up with when asked to describe "purgatory".

Posted by: Eugene S. at November 11, 2005 4:25 PM

Eugene:

The first season is out on DVD and I watched it last week. It's pretty good, but as I say, since they're likely to try and stretch the story for years they're likely to lose their audience.

Posted by: oj at November 11, 2005 4:41 PM

oj: If you watched the "Making of..." on the DVD you'll recall that they say that they pretty quickly had a 5-year story arc planned out. That's probably too long for what one can expect them to pull off coherently, and if somehow they are a success for another couple of years, they'll be pressured to keep the show going for far too long. It's the only show currently on TV that I bother to watch...

Posted by: b at November 11, 2005 5:22 PM

That's the main problem with Alias. It gave up any sense of a sustained plot. Lots of fun stuff though.

Posted by: Patrick H at November 11, 2005 6:31 PM

I quit watching Lost after two episodes because they were too cagey about letting out the story. A 2 month story arc might have kept me.

Posted by: pj at November 11, 2005 7:00 PM

I tried watching the pilot. In the first few minutes after the crash, the survivors were stumbling around near one of the plane's engines, which happened to land upside down, on its pylon, perfectly horizontal, and was still running! It was so ridiculous I immediately changed the channel.

Posted by: PapayaSF at November 11, 2005 9:06 PM

b:

I didn't, but if they're serious I'll stop watching now.

Posted by: oj at November 11, 2005 10:15 PM

You need 5 seasons (100+ episodes) in the can so you can syndicate the show Monday through Friday. So of course they're aiming for a 5-year arc. (Stargate SG-1 celebrated their 100th with an episode about a TV series based on the Stargate project. Some aliens gave the creator of the fictional series a massive dose of truth serum. The first thing he said under its influence was "The real money's in syndication.")

What, you thought the "5" in "Babylon-5" was a random number?

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at November 11, 2005 11:19 PM

Or, most famously, the original "5 year mission."

Posted by: David Cohen at November 11, 2005 11:51 PM

We've watched maybe five non-sequential episodes and categorically can state, we're lost too.

Each episode in a series has to make sense on its own even as it builds on previous programs. This one isn't even close.

Posted by: erp at November 12, 2005 4:48 PM

I have not watched the show, but simply from reading the article description my initial impression is that the "survivors" actually died in the crash and are in purgatory. Since all these people have issues to work out, they appear to be a selected group. Presumably, everyone who might have died in the crash went immediately to heaven or hell.

I also support the idea that certain series which are not meant to be episodic would do better having a set story arc to be completed in 3-5 years. Otherwise, you get bloat and it ruins it. X-Files did not do better when they expanded its originally planned number of seasons. The networks get only 1-2 seasons more of an obviously failing show, when they could be generating excitement for the next project from the producer that would equal the additional seasons even if it fails.

Posted by: Chris Durnell at November 14, 2005 11:31 AM
« AND THE "E" IN VALENTINE LIGHTS UP! (via Glenn Dryfoos, including title) | Main | WHAT SHOULD WE DO WITH THE SURPLUS?: »