November 29, 2005

DUPE:

Lieberman Expresses Confidence in Iraq After Thanksgiving Visit (AP, November 29, 2005)

Sen. Joe Lieberman, fresh from a two-day visit to Iraq over the Thanksgiving holiday, said Monday he was hopeful U.S. forces could begin a "significant" withdrawal by the end of next year or in 2007.

"The country is now in reach of going from Saddam Hussein to self-government and, I'd add, self-protection," the Connecticut Democrat said in a conference call with reporters. "That would be a remarkable transformation ... I saw real progress there."

Lieberman, one of the most hawkish Democrats in the Senate, said the effectiveness of Iraqi security forces and the ability of a new Iraqi government to rule after the Dec. 15 elections are critical factors in determining when U.S. troops could come home. But if all goes well, he forsees a pullout beginning a year from now.

"If Iraqi forces continue to gain the confidence the American military sees there now ... We will be able to draw down our forces," he said.


Our Troops Must Stay: America can't abandon 27 million Iraqis to 10,000 terrorists. (JOE LIEBERMAN, November 29, 2005, Opinion Journal)
I have just returned from my fourth trip to Iraq in the past 17 months and can report real progress there. More work needs to be done, of course, but the Iraqi people are in reach of a watershed transformation from the primitive, killing tyranny of Saddam to modern, self-governing, self-securing nationhood--unless the great American military that has given them and us this unexpected opportunity is prematurely withdrawn.

Progress is visible and practical.


MORE:
When will Iraqis be ready?:
In a speech Wednesday, Bush is expected to highlight increases in trained Iraqi battalions. (Howard LaFranchi, 11/30/05, The Christian Science Monitor)

Fewer Iraqi soldiers are deserting their posts, ongoing operations suggest. At the same time, Iraqi officers insist that battle and other operational experience is fostering a sense of purpose and "Iraqiness," making for better and more dedicated soldiers than they were seeing a year ago.

"There is now a passion [among Iraq's troops] for stopping these terrorists and playing a part in building the new Iraq that was not there before," says Gen. Abdul Aziz Mohamed Jasim, operations director in the Iraqi Ministry of Defense. "It gives us something to work with as we build the new Iraqi Army."

General Jasim adds that the "increasing efficiency" of the Iraqi Army that comes from training programs and experience on the ground is contributing to an "increasing level of confidence and sense of duty."

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 29, 2005 2:35 PM
Comments

One of the most hawkish Democrats? He's it.

Posted by: Melissa at November 29, 2005 2:42 PM

I wonder if Lieberman will be useful in undercutting the predicted (and occurring) Dem attempt to coopt the coming drawdowns.

Posted by: Timothy at November 29, 2005 3:02 PM

Rush wanted to trade Chafee and Snowe for Liberman.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at November 29, 2005 4:43 PM

If they throw in Zell Miller and agree to take Brent Scowcroft off our hands, it's a deal.

Posted by: Mike Morley at November 29, 2005 4:52 PM

Scowcroft can take Colin Powell and his boot-licker Armitage with him in the Zell trade.

Posted by: Jim in Chicago at November 29, 2005 7:35 PM

Those who respect language must continue to cringe at the cynical confusion of words of words such as "exit," "withdraw", and "come home," and of course, "pullout" with those denoting incrementalism, such as "reduce," "draw down," and "significant." Every time the word "batallion," is used as a measure of Iraq's ability to operate "independently," the lie is driven in more deeply.

This business is going to come back and bite us in the future. Our side is the one which is going to be accused, not without some justice, of having been "misleading." The fact that those people of the other side are a gang of bald-faced liars will not help us.

Posted by: Lou Gots at November 30, 2005 7:38 AM
« 60 IN '06: | Main | WHY EVEN HAVE THE HEARINGS? (via Robert Schwartz): »