August 23, 2005
THEY JUST WANT TO DIE IN PEACE:
Can Merkel Make It?: Germany's likely next chancellor is the prisoner of her own party. Reform? Shush. Don't even think about it. (Stefan Theil, 8/29/05, Newsweek International)
Gerhard Schröder was at it again. "Take the military options off the table," he roared at a campaign rally in Hannover. "We've all seen they're no good!"
Bashing George W. Bush worked the last time the German chancellor was locked in an uphill election battle, in 2002 on the eve of the Iraq war. So he was understandably tempted to try it again, this time hoping to ride to victory in next month's ballot by denouncing possible U.S. military action in Iran. And like last time, the salvo appeared to catch his opponent, now Angela Merkel, off guard. More than 80 percent of Germans support Schröder's antiwar stance, she knew, and reject her own pro-U.S. foreign policy. What to do? Waffle, obviously. A spokesman lashed out at Schröder and called for unity with Washington, while Merkel herself said she agreed with Schröder.This election should have been a slam dunk for Merkel. Her opponent, after all, presides over record 12 percent unemployment, five straight years of close-to-zero economic growth and an epidemic of angst over Germany's prospects. Even some of his own cabinet ministers treat the chancellor like a lame duck, openly speculating about political alliances in a post-Schröder era. By rights, these should be ideal circumstances for any opposition. Why, then, are Merkel and her Christian Democrats in such disarray?
Amid intramural bickering, the party has seen its once resounding majority in the polls continue to melt away, down from a 20-point margin in June to just 12 today (42 percent for the CDU to the SPD's 30 percent). Meanwhile, in Germany's depressed east, the CDU is running neck and neck with the Linkspartei, a new anti-establishment protest group that's grown out of the old East German communists and now speaks for 10 percent of the nation's voters. That arithmetic makes it practically impossible for Schröder to come out on top. But it also puts the odds near even that Merkel will fail to get her own majority and be forced to rule in a paralyzing "grand coalition" with Schröder's dysfunctional SPD.
She's not a prisoner of her party but of her people. Why would a dying Germany vote for interventionism abroad and welfare reform at home? Meanwhile, cute the way they refer to the new National Socialists as anti-establisment, huh? Posted by Orrin Judd at August 23, 2005 12:24 PM
Economist a week ago had a cover story on how Germany is roaring back economically and socially (11%+ inflation and almost zero growth notwithstanding). Clearly they don't agree with OJ's assessment.
Posted by: AWW at August 23, 2005 12:34 PMTwo weeks ago the cover story (for The Economist) was that China had the most important economy in the world. I didn't even bother to pick it up and thumb through it.
Germany is in worse shape than France, because their financial sector is weighed down much more heavily. France at least has banks that can grow; Germany does not.
Posted by: ratbert at August 23, 2005 12:52 PMDoes it matter who wins?
Posted by: erp at August 23, 2005 1:03 PMAs I noted last week - two months ago the Germans could choose between socialism-lite, socialism, or Nazism. Now that the CDU has to join up with the SPD socialism-lite is off the table. You'd think that by now the Germans would have learned that scapegoating won't solve any of their problems. Or maybe they are reminiscent of that brief period when scapegoating did put them on top.
Posted by: Shelton at August 23, 2005 1:18 PMTake the military options off the table, we've all seen they're no good!
No good for Germans, that's for sure, ha ha!
Posted by: Amos at August 23, 2005 1:52 PMLet's not be too harsh. The German army usually had a great first half.
Posted by: Casey Abell at August 23, 2005 3:38 PM