July 1, 2005

SAVINGS WON'T SAVE THEM (via Jim Yates):

Too Much Money: A global savings glut is good for growth -- but risks are mounting (Rich Miller With Jack Ewing in Frankfurt, Stanley Reed and Laura Cohn in London, Frederik Balfour in Hong Kong, David Henry in New York, and bureau reports, 7/11/05, Business Week)

Savings. It's an almost mystical word for economists -- the Holy Grail of growth. The more a country saves, the more it has available to invest. And the more it invests -- in computers, factories, or infrastructure -- the more productive its economy becomes and the faster it can grow. [...]

[S]urprising events are forcing economists, investors, and policymakers to think more globally than ever before. In just the past few months, they've begun to consider seriously two intertwined and heretical notions: What really matters for interest rates is the global economy, and there the problem may be too much savings, rather than too little.

Look around the world, and extra money is piling up in all sorts of places. Japanese corporations are recording record profits, but not doing much spending. Chinese companies are on an investment tear, but the country is getting so much money from exports that it has billions to spare, including $18.5 billion that China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC) bid for Unocal. The surge in oil prices -- now about $60 a barrel -- is giving oil-producing countries such as Russia and Saudi Arabia far more money than they can use right away. And the aging workers of Europe are building nest eggs for an uncertain future.

The International Monetary Fund predicts that in 2005 the worldwide savings rate should hit its highest level in at least two decades. Surprisingly, even in the profligate U.S., businesses have been accumulating huge sums as undistributed corporate profits -- running at a record annual rate of $542 billion in the first quarter -- have almost doubled in the past two years. This corporate hoarding explains why the U.S. national savings rate, which includes governments and businesses as well as households, rose to 14.7% of national income in the first quarter, up from 12.8% two years ago.

This unexpected surge of savings is like a rose with thorns. Low interest rates have the potential to power productivity, build wealth, and raise living standards throughout the world. As more and more workers in developing countries join the global economy, cheap money makes it easier to provide the equipment and infrastructure they need to prosper. Access to global savings has also enabled the U.S. private and public sectors to fund a big increase in housing construction and health-care spending in recent years, while simultaneously ramping up military outlays. The result: guns and butter -- all without boosting inflation or pushing up interest rates.

But the savings glut is creating new risks for the global economy, which is having a tough time absorbing the unanticipated flood of funds. Instead of going into productive investments, cheap money may be overheating spending and sending asset prices soaring too high, setting the stage for a future bust. "The odds of a catastrophic scenario have gone up," says Kenneth S. Rogoff, former chief economist at the IMF and a professor at Harvard University.


Those gluts will get consumed quickly as the elderly are forced to pay for their own exorbitant social welfare benefits in countries facing population/taxpayer decline and as their property values collapse because there are no people to live in the houses. But for Americans, with a uniquely growing population and economy, the global deflation and reforms like privatized SS and HSAs mean there's no end to the savings in sight. You think people hate us now? Watch as the economic divide accelerates.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 1, 2005 7:39 PM
Comments

The possibility of too much savings has been well-recognized at least since the 80s when lots of articles were written about how Japan had too much savings.

It doesn't take much to realize that there's a problem with the theory that saving rather than consuming is good, because then business can invest the savings in equipment to sell more stuff to people who ... aren't consuming because they've been told to save, save, save.

Posted by: David Cohen at July 1, 2005 9:53 PM

Japan's problem though was too little spending and unproductive savings, because of the types of accounts they have.

Posted by: oj at July 1, 2005 10:02 PM

All there is is spending, saving and taxes. If you're spending too little then you're saving too much.

Posted by: David Cohen at July 1, 2005 11:00 PM

You can have very high rates of savings, as we do, and spend a lot, as we do. Wealth isn't finite.

Posted by: oj at July 1, 2005 11:36 PM

There is much consternation lately about how longer term rates (i.e. the 10 yr) has fallen instead of risen in response to the recent Fed rate increases. The explanation usually given is that there is too much demand for these securities due to excess savings. And what do you think will happen to these rates as a) the savings further increases, and b) the govt starts using the social security surplus to invest into govt. bonds?

Posted by: AWW at July 2, 2005 12:14 AM

Is high degrees of saving that much of a problem in countries having capital structures and economies that encourage growth and investment?

Posted by: Ali Choudhury at July 2, 2005 6:00 AM

Ali:

The problem is rather few do.

Posted by: oj at July 2, 2005 7:25 AM

Yeah, that was the point I should have made earlier.

The balance between savings\consumption doesn't seem nearly as critical as the fact that the Eurozone and Japan are offering few incentives for global capital to pour in.

Posted by: Ali Choudhury at July 2, 2005 8:22 AM

They're dying. There are no incentives that would make them attractive.

Posted by: oj at July 2, 2005 8:27 AM

there is only one project suitable for absorbing all this money -- space colonization.

Posted by: cjm at July 2, 2005 11:53 AM

Wealth isn't the issue here, income is. Wealth is just the sum of lifetime savings and if you're spending more than your income, you're dissaving.

Posted by: David Cohen at July 2, 2005 8:02 PM

But if you're saving unproductively, like the Japanese, and nor spending enough to keep the economy going, like the Japanese, there's trouble, like Japan.

Posted by: oj at July 2, 2005 8:11 PM

Absolutely. The Japanese don't buy anything, so all the business investment in the world isn't going to help and 0% interest rates for, what, 10 years now haven't convinced them to start buying.

Posted by: David Cohen at July 2, 2005 10:01 PM

Yes, their demise isn't related to money.

Posted by: oj at July 2, 2005 10:14 PM

Exactly.

Posted by: David Cohen at July 3, 2005 12:05 PM
« WE’RE GONNA NEED SOME BIGGER CONFESSIONALS | Main | HOW ABOUT A WEIRD RELIGIOUS ONE?: »