June 16, 2005
WHEN THE INSTITUTION PRECEDES THE PURPOSE:
Europe in search of a new rationale (Katrin Bennhold, JUNE 16, 2005, International Herald Tribune)
The European Union, whose foundations were laid after World War II with the principal aim of safeguarding peace and stability, needs a new raison d'ĂȘtre, they say, and can find it in the challenge of globalization.
"Today, Europeans don't have the perception of a common threat, just a diffuse concern about globalization and declining levels of welfare," Ana Palacio said.
The head of the Spanish Parliament's joint committee on European affairs added, "We need to market Europe as an answer to globalization." [...]Beyond communication, a key question is how to make economic globalization work for Europe.
At the moment, there are two camps: Those, notably in Britain and the Nordic countries, who have lobbied for more deregulation in Europe and favor enlargement; and those, notably in France and Germany, who are pushing for more political integration and have traditionally taken a cooler view on the union's expansion.
It's the protestant North, favoring liberty, vs. the statist continent. Posted by Orrin Judd at June 16, 2005 8:55 AM
There's some tension in the idea of using Europeanization to combat globalization. It's already acknowledging that nationalism is too narrow a boundary and that the modern world with Internet technologies needs connections on a larger scale. So, why not globalization? Or, if you reject globalization, why not nationalism?
Thus it's no great surprise that some Europeans reject the Franco-German vision of the EU because it's too narrow and localized, while the French voters reject it because it's too geographically broad and insufficiently nationalistic.
Posted by: pj at June 16, 2005 10:34 AMThe EU's answer to the problem of globalization is straightforward: hide.
Posted by: Luciferous at June 16, 2005 11:02 AMThe "protestant North" and the "statist continent"? Go ahead and say it - "the Catholic continent". Because the continent is as Catholic as the north is Protestant.
Posted by: Brandon at June 16, 2005 12:14 PMnot since 1789.
Posted by: oj at June 16, 2005 12:26 PMChristian faith was weak on the Continent even before 1789, discredited in part by the religious wars that were propagated by corrupt rulers who aggrandized their own power by fomenting war. Christian institutions were then greatly weakened by the violent secularization that took place under the French revolutionaries and then Napoleon, who kidnapped the pope, emptied the monasteries, and stabled horses in cathedrals. Since then the laicists on the Continent have attacked Christianity relentlessly, and they largely succeeded in turning the continental populace into unbelievers by World War I.
Spengler at Asia Times has often made the good point that continental Europe was never more than half Christian, they retain pagan nationalist and racial prejudices that are incompatible with Christianity.
Meanwhile, faith was restored in England and America by the religious Great Awakenings, especially the first that flourished with the turnpike roads that networked England in the 1720s, when John Wesley began preaching. No such Great Awakening occurred on the continent.
Posted by: pj at June 16, 2005 12:44 PMAfrica is more catholic than continental Europe.
Posted by: Shelton at June 16, 2005 1:13 PMIt probably has a lot more to do with where feudalism put down its deepest roots. There are some forms of Protestantism, like Lutheranism and Anglicanism, which are every bit as statist and corporatist as Catholicism.
Posted by: bart at June 16, 2005 2:00 PMThe French revolution was virulently antireligious.
Posted by: Mike Morley at June 16, 2005 3:12 PMShelton,
Africa is also, to the best of it's feeble abilities, more statist than continental Europe.
Posted by: Brandon at June 16, 2005 4:41 PMSounds to me like they're both tribal.
Posted by: Sandy P. at June 16, 2005 6:03 PMMike,
Given the behavior of the Church in France for the preceding 1500 years or so that is not surprising.
Posted by: bart at June 16, 2005 7:35 PMpj:
I think you might be minimising the devestating effect WW1 (especially) and WW2 had on religious faith in Europe.
Posted by: Ali Choudhury at June 17, 2005 7:27 AM