February 19, 2005

QUEER PURGE:

Rove-Gannon Connection? (Dotty Lynch, Feb. 18, 2005, CBS News)

hen Jeff Gannon, White House "reporter" for Talon "News," was unmasked last week, the leap to a possible Rove connection was unavoidable. Gannon says that he met Rove only once, at a White House Christmas party, and Gannon is kind of small potatoes for Rove at this point in his career.

But Rove's dominance of White House and Republican politics, Gannon's aggressively partisan work and the ease with which he got day passes for the White House press room the past two years make it hard to believe that he wasn't at least implicitly sanctioned by the "boy genius." Rove, who rarely gave on-the-record interviews to the MSM (mainstream media), had time to talk to GOPUSA, which owns Talon.

GOPUSA and Talon are both owned by Bobby Eberle, a Texas Republican and business associate of conservative direct-mail guru Bruce Eberle who says that Bobby is from the "Texas branch of the Eberle clan." Bobby Eberle told The New York Times that he created Talon to build a news service with a conservative slant and "if someone were to see 'GOPUSA,' there's an instant built-in bias there." No kidding.

Some of the real reporters in the White House pressroom were apparently annoyed at Gannon's presence and his softball, partisan questions, but considered him only a minor irritant. One told me he thought of Gannon as a balance for the opinionated liberal questions of Hearst's Helen Thomas. But what Gannon was up to was not just writing opinion columns or using a different technique to get information. He was a player in Republican campaigns and his work in the South Dakota Senate race illustrates the role he played. It is also a classic example of how political operatives are using the brave new world of the Internet and the blogosphere. Gannon and Talon News appear to be mini-Drudge reports; a "news" source which partisans use to put out negative information, get the attention of the bloggers, talk radio and then the MSM in a way that mere press releases are unable to achieve. [...]

This week Democrats, who have serious case of Rove envy, went a little nuts and started sending around information and graphic pictures of Gannon and his porn Web sites. But it is the more routine part of Gannon's life that deserves serious scrutiny. Planting or even just sanctioning a political operative in the WH press room is a dangerous precedent and Karl Rove's hope to become a respected policymaker will be hampered if the dirty tricks from his political past are more apparent than his desire to spread liberty around the globe.


The best part of this whole scandal is that the Left has seized on it as another opportunity to go gay-bashing. One assumes you won't hear many Democrats saying it should be dropped though just because it's "only about sex."


MORE:
Jeff Gannon Admits Past 'Mistakes,' Berates Critics (Howard Kurtz, February 19, 2005, Washington Post)

Jeff Gannon, the former White House reporter whose naked pictures have appeared on a number of gay escort sites, says that he has "regrets" about his past but that White House officials knew nothing about his salacious activities. [...]

In the interview, Gannon did not dispute evidence that he has advertised himself as a $200-an-hour gay escort but would not specifically address such questions.

Dismissing speculation that he had a permanent White House press pass, which requires a full-blown FBI background check that usually takes months, Gannon said he could not get one because he was required to first get a pass from the Senate press gallery, which did not consider him to be working for a legitimate news organization. Instead, he said he was admitted on a day-to-day basis after supplying his real name, date of birth and Social Security number. He said he did not use a pseudonym to hide his past but because his real last name is hard to spell and pronounce.

Gannon said he began covering the White House in February 2003, at least a month before Talon News was created. He said he was then working for GOPUSA. Talon was launched as "a marketing consideration to separate the news division from something that could be viewed as partisan," he said.

Suggestions that White House officials coddled him or gave him special access are "absolutely, completely, totally untrue," Gannon said, adding that he was often among the last to be called on at press briefings and sometimes could not ask a question at all. "I have no friendships with anyone there. . . . The White House, as far as I know, was never aware of the questions about my past."

Asked how recently he was putting his photo on escort sites, Gannon said that "so much of this stuff" was "years in the past. . . . Anything that goes on the Internet is there forever," he said. "Every day I learn about another site where there are allegedly pictures of me."

Gannon says he was questioned by the FBI in the Valerie Plame leak investigation after referring to a classified CIA document when he interviewed the outed CIA operative's husband, former ambassador Joe Wilson.

But he said yesterday: "I didn't have the document. I never saw the document. It was written about in the Wall Street Journal a week before. I had no special access to classified information."

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 19, 2005 5:11 PM
Comments

Until they can show a case where "Talon 'News' " tried to protray fake documents as real, and as long as Dan "Kenneth" Rather is still associated with them, I think it should be called CBS "News".

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at February 19, 2005 6:05 PM

Notice the big scandalous tone in the CBS piece that Talon is owned by someone with GOP ties--you can almost hear the Dragnet "Dum de dum dum" riff in the background as you read it.

Last time I checked, the chairman of Disney (which owns ABC and hence its news division, which is a tad larger and more influential than Talon) has some sort of vague ties to the Democrats in his own past as well...

Posted by: Ed Driscoll at February 19, 2005 6:32 PM

dotty is as dotty does.

"once we get the gays, blacks, and hispanics out of the party we will finally be able to show those republicans a thing or two about winning elections"

Posted by: cjm at February 19, 2005 6:56 PM

I'd bet money that some tiny, lefty "news" publication got their reporter into Clinton news conferences with a day pass, and that Clinton got softball questions from them. (Of course, they might be hard to distinguish from the softball questions mainstream media reporters often tossed to Clinton.)

Posted by: PapayaSF at February 19, 2005 7:39 PM

the funniest it in any of the stories is how other reporters didn't much notive him because they thought he was kind of a Helen Thomas for the Right--ignoring the difference between AP and Talon news.

Posted by: oj at February 19, 2005 7:50 PM

I counted three hours and five minutes last night between the time Ms. Lynch's piece was first posted on Lucianne.oom and others had posted Dotty's pre-CBS biography, which included directing polling for George McGovern, Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, the Democratic National Committee and the 1984 Mondale campaign. She went to work for CBS the year following Mondale's loss to Reagan, though 20 years at the network doesn't mean she's had to change her sympathies.

Posted by: John at February 19, 2005 11:05 PM

Not that's he's gay, that he was a whore. Some people, even on the Left, still make that distinction.

And that he was a fraud.

Since there are no standards to become a reporter, anybody who says he is one, is one; just as anyone who says he is a Christian is a Christian.

As a reporter who gets paid, though, I can tell you that whether you are how you say you are affects the quality of the answers you get.

It's sort of Armstrong Williams again. If you have to pay for compliments, maybe you ought to wonder if you're worthy of them.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 21, 2005 5:50 PM

With a press that's so hostile to the beliefs of most Americans and to Republicans in particular, anything you can do to destroy its credibility is worthwhile. Right now the media is approaching zero so it seems to be working.

That the Left is gone a gaybashing again is just a bonus.

Posted by: oj at February 21, 2005 5:59 PM

We've seen the results of a corrupted political press before, during FDR's presidency. That was good for FDR but bad for the country.

I cannot see that the equation has changed just because its a different party.I

I dislike being part of the 'media.' I'm a newspaperman, nothing to do with electronic 'news.'

But whichever, it's difficult to imagine no 'media.' People will get information, whether it's good or not, rather than forgo it. We saw that in the USSR.

So whoever supplies information (or misinformation) to the most people will become the new 'mass medium.'

That ain't gonna be blogs.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 22, 2005 5:19 PM

Nice delusion that it was pure betwixt.

Posted by: oj at February 22, 2005 5:50 PM

I didn't say it was.

The political effects were more noticeable in thee '30s and '00s, though.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at February 23, 2005 4:32 PM

and the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s....

Posted by: oj at February 23, 2005 5:04 PM
« RHETORIC CREATES REALITY: | Main | TRIANGULATING FROM THE TRIANGLE: »