January 20, 2005

SAMENESS:

How Bush's God-Talk Is Different: When Bush speaks of God, he positions himself as a prophetic spokesperson rather than a petitioning supplicant. (David Domke and Kevin Coe, 1/20/05, Belief Net)

Bush also talks about God differently than most other modern presidents. Presidents since Roosevelt have commonly spoken as petitioners of God, seeking blessing, favor, and guidance. This president positions himself as a prophet, issuing declarations of divine desires for the nation and world. Among modern presidents, only Reagan has spoken in a similar manner—and he did so far less frequently than has Bush.

This striking change in White House rhetoric is apparent in how presidents have spoken about God and the values of freedom and liberty, two ideas central to American identity. Consider a few examples.

Roosevelt in 1941, in a famous address delineating four essential freedoms threatened by fascism, said: “This nation has placed its destiny in the hands and heads and hearts of its millions of free men and women; and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God.”

Similarly, Dwight Eisenhower in 1954, during the height of the Cold War, said: “Happily, our people, though blessed with more material goods than any people in history, have always reserved their first allegiance to the kingdom of the spirit, which is the true source of that freedom we value above all material things....So long as action and aspiration humbly and earnestly seek favor in the sight of the Almighty, there is no end to America’s forward road; there is no obstacle on it she will not surmount in her march toward a lasting peace in a free and prosperous world.”

Contrast these statements, in which presidents spoke as petitioners humbly asking for divine guidance, with Bush’s claim in 2003 that “Americans are a free people, who know that freedom is the right of every person and the future of every nation. The liberty we prize is not America’s gift to the world, it is God’s gift to humanity.” This is not a request for divine favor; it is a declaration of divine wishes.

Such rhetoric positions the president as a prophetic spokesman for God rather than as a petitioning supplicant. Such certitude is dangerous—even for those who share such views—because U.S. presidents have the unique ability to act upon their beliefs in ways that affect billions of people worldwide.


You bet--just listen to how uncertain George Washington sounded about God and His wishes, WASHINGTON'S INAUGURAL ADDRESS OF 1789 (April 30, 1789):
No People can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the Affairs of men more than the People of the United States. Every step, by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation, seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency. And in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their United Government, the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities, from which the event has resulted, cannot be compared with the means by which most Governments have been established, without some return of pious gratitude along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me I trust in thinking, that there are none under the influence of which, the proceedings of a new and free Government can more auspiciously commence.

...and note how hesitant JFK sounds, Inaugural Address of John F. Kennedy (JANUARY 20, 1961)
Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens, we observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom--symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning--signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago.

The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe--the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.

We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans--born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage--and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty. [...]

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.


Of course, contrary to the authors' bizarre assertion, the essence of what it is to be an American is expressed in words that brook no doubt:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...

Meanwhile, here's a portion of what the President actually said today:
We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom. Not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability; it is human choices that move events. Not because we consider ourselves a chosen nation; God moves and chooses as He wills. We have confidence because freedom is the permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the soul. When our Founders declared a new order of the ages; when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on liberty; when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner "Freedom Now" - they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty.

Mr. Bush would appear to swim quite comfortably in the mainstream of American ideology and rhetoric.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 20, 2005 6:31 PM
Comments

Nope Bush is different with his "God-talk". Not like other Presidents. At least in the late 20th century. The words may be the same, but many people are terrified that Bush actually believes it, which wasn't a factor with other Presidents. (On the other hand there are many who comforted by that thought)

Posted by: h-man at January 20, 2005 7:21 PM

Yep. Compare and contrast the number of times Bill Clinton evoke GOD's name vs. W. The difference is that the MSM & the leftists knew that Clinton don't believe a single word, but W believe. When you're firm in your belief, what's the point of branding it about?

Posted by: BigFire at January 20, 2005 9:19 PM

Petitioner vs prophet?

Wasn't it Abe Lincoln who said, (from memory, so perhaps not verbatim:

"My concern is not whether God is on my side, but whether I am on God's side."

Posted by: Mike Earl at January 20, 2005 9:36 PM

When the left speaks of Bush they postion themselves as describing archetypel bogeymen, not the men they could observe if they tried to, because they have not tried to observe anything because they already know it all.

Just read Philip Roth. He learned everything he needs to know about George Bush in Newark, New Jersey when he was an 11 year old kid. Observing the world thereafter would just clutter his brain.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at January 20, 2005 10:41 PM

For what it's worth, Bush's multiple refrences to God in his inaugural speech seems to have left Peggy Noonan unsettled though strangely for a former Reagan speechwriter, she never mentions the former president or how he would have handled the same basic themes in an inaugural speech.

Posted by: John at January 21, 2005 12:30 AM

I think they need to check the basement for pods over at the WSJ building. I think Peggy Noonan's been replaced by an alien.

Posted by: Mike Morley at January 21, 2005 6:44 AM
« ALLIES WHO MATTER: | Main | THEN COMES JANICE ROGERS BROWN....: »