January 9, 2005
IMITATE YOUR SUCCESSES:
‘The Salvador Option’: The Pentagon may put Special-Forces-led assassination or kidnapping teams in Iraq (Michael Hirsh and John Barry, Jan. 9, 2005, Newsweek)
What to do about the deepening quagmire of Iraq? The Pentagon’s latest approach is being called "the Salvador option"—and the fact that it is being discussed at all is a measure of just how worried Donald Rumsfeld really is. "What everyone agrees is that we can’t just go on as we are," one senior military officer told NEWSWEEK. "We have to find a way to take the offensive against the insurgents. Right now, we are playing defense. And we are losing." Last November’s operation in Fallujah, most analysts agree, succeeded less in breaking "the back" of the insurgency—as Marine Gen. John Sattler optimistically declared at the time—than in spreading it out.Now, NEWSWEEK has learned, the Pentagon is intensively debating an option that dates back to a still-secret strategy in the Reagan administration’s battle against the leftist guerrilla insurgency in El Salvador in the early 1980s. Then, faced with a losing war against Salvadoran rebels, the U.S. government funded or supported "nationalist" forces that allegedly included so-called death squads directed to hunt down and kill rebel leaders and sympathizers. Eventually the insurgency was quelled, and many U.S. conservatives consider the policy to have been a success—despite the deaths of innocent civilians and the subsequent Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal. (Among the current administration officials who dealt with Central America back then is John Negroponte, who is today the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. Under Reagan, he was ambassador to Honduras.)
Following that model, one Pentagon proposal would send Special Forces teams to advise, support and possibly train Iraqi squads, most likely hand-picked Kurdish Peshmerga fighters and Shiite militiamen, to target Sunni insurgents and their sympathizers, even across the border into Syria, according to military insiders familiar with the discussions.
Iran/Contra worked too. Posted by Orrin Judd at January 9, 2005 2:46 PM
Just do it, don't talk about it.
Posted by: Bart at January 9, 2005 3:12 PM.......are we sure that it was in El Salvador? I thought it was Nicaragua....
Posted by: budd at January 9, 2005 4:30 PM.......are we sure that it was in El Salvador? I thought it was Nicaragua....
Posted by: budd at January 9, 2005 4:30 PMBart's exactly right: puiblicizing wet ops is as stupid as writing memos about torture.
Posted by: Lou Gots at January 9, 2005 4:47 PM"many U.S. conservatives consider the policy to have been a success"
Many El Salvadoran's do to, ask them.
Posted by: carter at January 9, 2005 5:26 PMTypical bait and switch journalism -- begin by talking about paramilitary operations in El Salvador and then switch to the Iran/Contra problems involving Nicaragua.
Posted by: jd watson at January 9, 2005 5:46 PMSounds like a plan.
Posted by: Genecis at January 10, 2005 11:14 AMI'd be disappointed if we weren't doing this already.
5 or 10 dead Syrian soldiers a week (or a few kills in Damascus) would go a long way.
Posted by: jim hamlen at January 10, 2005 2:54 PM