November 20, 2004
THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS:
Televangelical tentacles: TV evangelist Pat Robertson is threatening to mobilise millions of his Christian viewers and "de-liberalise" the US judiciary (Philip James, November 19, 2004, The Guardian)
There is a defining moment in the life of every news organisation that marks a coming of age. In the case of CNN it was the opening bombardment of the first Gulf war. The upstart cable channel went live to Peter Arnett in Baghdad, while the traditional broadcast networks could only watch from their New York studios in shock and awe.In the case of the Manchester Guardian, it was the day in 1959 when the paper reached beyond its Mancunian roots to become a national newspaper. And in the case of The 700 Club, Pat Robertson's daily evangelical news broadcast, it was November 3 2004. The day it became clear that George Bush had won a second term.
This day formally marked the transformation of The 700 Club. No longer could it be viewed as an outlet of relevance only to the loony Christian right. Not only did it join the ranks of the mainstream media. In many ways it supplanted them. Suddenly, if you seriously wanted to take the pulse of America, you had to tune your TV to the news division of televangelism.
The 700 Club has been operating under the radar of traditional journalistic scrutiny for over two decades. Anchored by Pat Robertson, he initially created it as a vehicle to promote his personal political ambitions. After his failed presidential bid in 1988, Robertson founded the Christian Coalition and embarked on an ambitious plan to influence the mainstream political agenda from the inside out.
He used The 700 Club as the marketing and political advocacy tool of this plan. The broadcast's focus is instructing viewers on how they could best lobby elected officials to enact the Christian right's agenda.
Robertson's show regularly has more viewers than CNN.
CBN's nightly newscast is better than CNN's or any of the networks. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 20, 2004 6:04 PM
"Better." Your definition being what, "agreeing with you?"
Posted by: at November 20, 2004 7:40 PMAnon:
No, "better" meaning stories you would never hear on the MSM, but which are none the less vital and interesting. The remainder of the program is unwatchable.
Yes, their news coverage is rather thorough, especially compared to the networks.
Posted by: oj at November 20, 2004 7:49 PMIt is best to ignore schmucks too cowardly to identify themselves.
CBN presents a valuable alternative view, although it is hardly more dispositive than the MSM. The difference is that CBN says 'We're Christian and we're biased' shouting it from the rooftops in a truly refreshing candor. The MSM, like the discredited Dan Rather, insists that it is objective. But the Soviets called their party newspapers, 'Truth' and 'News', leading to the old joke there is no truth in Pravda and no news in Isvestia.
Posted by: Bart at November 20, 2004 8:17 PMDitto Bart!
Posted by: Dave W. at November 20, 2004 10:21 PMWhat outlet would Mr."at November" recommend for "unbiased" reporting?
Posted by: ed at November 21, 2004 9:16 AMI keep picturing that troll from Harry Potter with a stick up his nose. I bet this guy would insist he put it there himself.
But wouldn't it be delightful if the word, troll (in internet usage), were actually short for trollop?
Remember, don't feed the trollops!
Posted by: Randall Voth at November 21, 2004 10:22 AM