November 20, 2004

ALL THAT REMAINS IS THE INTELLECTUAL ELITE:

The Liberal Crack-Up (R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., 11/18/2004, The American Spectator)

History takes time. To understand the historic decline of the Democratic Party I have found it useful to reach back to a book I wrote in 1984, The Liberal Crack-Up. It is a diagnosis of what was then the core philosophy of the Democratic Party, liberalism, and a prognosis of its future. Doctor Tyrrell was not optimistic, but history takes time.

Today the Democratic Party has lost both houses of Congress, the presidency, many state offices it had controlled for at least two generations. It is about to be outpaced throughout the federal judiciary. The liberal crack-up began with the defeat of that liberal fantastico, Jimmy Carter. It picked up steam during the 1990s, when the Democrats lost the House and the Senate and many state offices -- and the media's legend endures that President Bill Clinton is a political genius. His genius is in self-promotion. He is a cunning huckster. But the liberal crack-up did not reach the point of no return until November 2, 2004. Then on that glad and glorious morn, that reductio ad absurdum of a liberal presidential candidate, Jean-François Kerry, the Democratic elites, and all the liberals in the media beheld Victory. It was to be a return to their vicarious lives as Kennedys!, Roosevelts!, Progressives!

Alas, by November 3 their delusions became very difficult to maintain. Sure there are many who still think they won. Doubtless Jean-François, his balmy wife, and many in his entourage still feel as morally and intellectually superior as they did in the expectant hours of November 2. Yet clear-headed students of politics today recognize that the Democratic Party has suffered a catastrophic defeat. Some, such as Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago and Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana, are politely suggesting that their party is in need of a philosophy transplant, something less narcissistic, less out-of-this world, than the troubled philosophy that since the 1960s has been at its core, namely, liberalism.

Some will say liberalism was the very core of the Democrats' beloved New Deal, but they err. The liberalism of the New Deal was leavened with urban machine politics, Southern conservatism, and that wild and woolly philosophical hybrid, western populism. The liberalism that became rampant in the Democratic Party beginning in the late 1960s drove out all other intellectual impulses.


They are at this point essentially a European party.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 20, 2004 8:29 PM
Comments

Not in the Mid-West.

Posted by: M Ali Choudhury at November 21, 2004 4:09 AM

I disagree Ali. Here in Minnesota, liberalism borrows a lot from the Scandinavian populist/collectivist notions that many of the immigrants to this area still cling to. Of course it is mostly in the Twin Cities urban areas that you see this, the rural farming areas have been voting conservative for some time now.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at November 21, 2004 1:17 PM

"Doubtless Jean-François, his balmy wife ... "

I am reluctant to question Mr. Tyrell or his editor, but didn't they mean "... barmy ..." ?

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at November 21, 2004 1:35 PM

Robert:

What about IL, MI and WI?

Posted by: M Ali Choudhury at November 21, 2004 2:56 PM
« THEY DON'T CALL HIM AMERICA'S MAYOR FOR NOTHIN': | Main | TOM DELAY, dEMOCRAT: »