October 4, 2004
WHAT IS A BULLET GOING FOR THESE DAYS?
Cambodia approves Khmer Rouge tribunal (Peter Lloyd, ABC News, October 4th, 2004)
Cambodia's Parliament has passed a law to establish a war crimes tribunal to try surviving members of the Khmer Rouge regime.Up to 2 million people were killed or died of starvation and disease during the regime's brutal rule between 1975 and 1979.
After more than five years of talks the vote was unanimous.
The new law provides a framework for the operation of a United Nations backed tribunal that will put surviving Khmer Rouge leaders on trial.
None of the regime's top leaders has been brought to justice.
The movement's chief, Pol Pot, died in a jungle hideout in 1998.
Several of his top lieutenants still live freely in Cambodia. Only two are in custody.
Despite today's vote, Cambodia's current Government has cast doubt over the planned trials going ahead because of a shortage of money to fund the process.
The United Nations and Cambodia believe the war crimes prosecution will cost nearly $70 million.The only donation so far is a little over $2 million from Australia.
Do you get the impression there is a certain lack of gravitas here? Perhaps the human rights industry is exhausted after investing so much in chasing down Pinochet for his three thousand victims. It can't have anything to do with ideology, can it?
Pol Pot's dead, and Cambodia doesn't seem too keen on prosecuting the other top leaders of the Khmer Rouge.
How much attention should the world pay ?
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at October 4, 2004 8:48 AM3000 deaths is genocide.
2,000,000 deaths is a statistic.
Posted by: Uncle Bill at October 4, 2004 9:27 AMAnd besides which, the Khmer Rouge were on the Right Side in VIETNAM! VIETNAM! VIETNAM! Just like JFKerry (who by the way won Three Purple Hearts Serving In Vietnam).
>WHAT IS A BULLET GOING FOR THESE DAYS?
Still more than a "Cambodian Lynching Hat", i.e. a reusable plastic bag tied over the head. Favorite of the Khmer Rouge for cost-effectiveness and reusability.
Posted by: Ken at October 4, 2004 12:39 PMMichael:
That may be a fair point, but it is hardly consistent with the notions that war crimes are an international matter.
Posted by: Peter B at October 4, 2004 5:45 PMWar crimes aren't an international matter, and never have been.
Where war criminals have been prosecuted, it's been by the victorious side in armed conflict, not by some completely disinterested nation from around the world.
Milosevic isn't being tried in New Zealand.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at October 4, 2004 7:46 PMHe isn't being tried in Kosovo, either, Or the US, for that matter.
Posted by: jim hamlen at October 5, 2004 4:42 PM"Milosevic isn't being tried in New Zealand."
But he is being tried in Old Zealand.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at October 5, 2004 5:52 PM