October 29, 2004

FOR FUTURE REFERENCE:

US occupation through Iraqi eyes (Pan Hu, 10/29/04, Asia Times)

Rumored to be Iraq's next ambassador to the United States, Dr Kanan Makiya, a formerly exiled Iraqi intellectual best known as the author of Republic of Fear: The Politics of Modern Iraq, was one of the strongest proponents of ousting Saddam Hussein through invasion and still feels removing Saddam's tyrannical regime was clearly the right thing to do. But while his critics cite his close links to neo-conservatives in the George W Bush administration as the reasoning behind these sentiments, Makiya is by no means adverse to dishing out some of his own criticism of the US's handling of postwar Iraq.

Last Monday, at a lecture hosted by the World Affairs Council of Washington, DC, in Maryland, Makiya acknowledged the precarious security situation in Iraq and the insurgency's stubborn resilience. But he asserted that the insurgency's threat is significantly limited by the fact that it offers no political alternative to Iraqi citizens. Fueled primarily by economic hardship and anger at the foreign occupation, the insurgency cannot win the support of Iraqis who wish to fight for something, not merely against something.

While Makiya is confident that as material conditions slowly but steadily improve for ordinary Iraqis, and as the American occupation's profile diminishes, the insurgency will collapse from its lack of a constructive program, even if it takes several years, he still insists that stabilizing Iraq is an Iraqi matter, and it was a mistake on Washington's part to not grant sovereignty to Iraqi leaders in the immediate aftermath of the invasion. By establishing a formal occupation authority, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), to dominate Iraqi affairs, the US gave an unmistakable impression of naked self-interest that would color Iraqi perceptions of its policies. Moreover, by bungling an entire year's effort to establish indigenous security forces, the CPA set the stage for the sharp escalation of guerilla violence that engulfed Iraq last spring.


It's the most important lesson of the Iraq/Afghanistan war and will need to be applied in places like Palestine, Syria, Iran, etc.--Muslim populations are more than ready to govern themselves and eager to do so relatively liberally. Unlike post-WWII Germany and Japan, our presence is a hindrance, not a help.

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 29, 2004 11:03 AM
Comments

If any lessons need remembering, it's an older one, that war is the extension of policy by other means.

You don't fight to win but to get your policy adopted.

While the insurgency is divided and, I agree, has divided policies, it is not quite true that it has none at all.

The Iranian-backed sector certainly has a policy.

It is not at all clear that the US-backed policy is workable. If the Kurds opt out, as I expect they cannot wait to do, then a dynamically stable 3-way equilibrium becomes far harder to manage.

Not that there's much evidence that Iraq is full of the skilled politicians that might be able to manage such a delicate arrangement.

The Orrin alternative, allout civil war with the Sunni driven out, is probably also unworkable, because uncontainable.

Had the Iraqis (whoever they are) been given control over a year ago, their would be a stable government of some sort in Baghdad now, probably an Iranian puppet but possibly just another gangster.

The chance that there would be some sort of popular self-government going is absurd.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 29, 2004 4:48 PM

There is no Iranian backed sector.

Posted by: oj at October 30, 2004 12:12 AM

Sure there is, your pal Sistani

Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 30, 2004 1:18 AM

The Iranians hate Sistani because he creates pressure for them to democratize.

Posted by: oj at October 30, 2004 8:36 AM

Sigh.

Here you have a religion based on brigandage, and a prize worth $40 trillion, and you think nobody's gonna contend for it?

Posted by: Harry Eagar at October 31, 2004 3:14 PM
« EMINEM HAS SEEN THE FUTURE, AND IT WORKS!: | Main | WHERE'S BOOM-BOOM MANCINI WHEN YOU NEED HIM? (via The Mother Judd): »