September 28, 2004

FAITH BASED NATIONAL SECURITY:

Sikh Group Finds Calling in Homeland Security (LESLIE WAYNE, 9/28/04, NY Times)

At the end of a dusty road, behind a barbed-wire fence, is the Sikh Dharma of New Mexico, a religious compound with a golden temple of worship, a collection of trailers used for business and a quiet group of people wandering the grounds wearing flowing white robes and turbans.

In the New Age culture here, the Sikh Dharma community, founded in the early 1970's, provides a place where admirers of Yogi Bhajan, a Sikh spiritual leader and yoga master, can live in harmony and follow their beliefs in vegetarianism, meditation and community service. Except for Yogi Bhajan, who was born in India and came to the United States in 1969, most members of the Sikh Dharma are American-born converts who moved here to pursue their way of life.

The compound is also home to Akal Security, wholly owned by the Sikh Dharma and one of the nation's fastest-growing security companies, benefiting from a surge in post-9/11 business. With 12,000 employees and over $1 billion in federal contracts, Akal specializes in protecting vital and sensitive government sites, from military installations to federal courts to airports and water supply systems.

Despite Akal's unusual lineage, Sikh Dharma members say they are following an ancient Sikh tradition of the warrior-saint - as well as showing deftness at the more modern skill of landing federal contracts. [...]

For all the group's unusual ways, government officials have few complaints about Akal. "Our people have done checks on them years ago and we have no issues with them," said John Kraus, a contracting officer for the Department of Justice. "Last I've checked, we've had freedom of religion."

One high-profile contract Akal recently garnered, beating 20 other companies, was for $250 million to provide security guards at five Army bases and three weapons depots. The Army has turned to the private sector to replace soldiers sent to Iraq.

Competition was based on ability, past performance and price, according to an Army official, who added that Akal's religious ties were not a factor, nor did Akal benefit as a religious group.

"We do not discriminate based on race, creed, religion or national origin," the official said. "It was never really a factor."

Because of that open approach, Akal has almost exclusively gone after government contracts.

"The federal government has created the fairest acquisition system in the world," Mr. Khalsa said. He added that with the company's low overhead - Mr. Khalsa, its top executive, earns a modest $90,000 - Akal is "very price-competitive" in the eyes of government agencies on tight budgets.


We could use some ghurkas too.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 28, 2004 10:36 PM
Comments

I consulted for two summers in Malaysia with an overseas Chinese corporation. The company guards were Sikhs, their only weapons a foot-long wooden billy club each. Noone messed with these guys.

Posted by: Jorge Curioso at September 28, 2004 10:43 PM

If everyone in America lived their faith the way that the Sikh Dharma and Cat Stevens do, then I'd agree that the US are a religious nation.

However, more people bring their work home with them than live at all times by what they profess in their places of worship.

America was founded by people with religious faith, and America's current society is based on Judeo-Christian philosophy and practice.
The very light patina of religious conviction that most Americans experience may indeed be a crucial difference between America and Europe, and the key to their diverging futures.

However, none of that makes America a religious nation.
Afghanistan, under the Taliban, was a religious nation.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at September 29, 2004 12:26 AM

That Taliban Afghanistan was a religious nation does not require Talibanism as the test of religiosity.

Posted by: oj at September 29, 2004 12:31 AM

Extremism isn't necessary, but a start would be to simply apply whatever religious principles one believes in, to all areas of one's life.

That isn't now occuring in large numbers in America, except among groups like the Amish or Sikh Dharma.

Americans may be a religious people, but America isn't a religious nation.
The vast majority of employees at the Kimberly-Clark plant in Ogden, Utah, may be religious, but the Kimberly-Clark company is not a religious company.
Deseret Industries is a religious company.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at September 29, 2004 2:26 AM

Michael: The State is not the Nation.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 29, 2004 7:40 AM

And the very religiousness of the State--for instance, the requirement to treat everyone with the dignity they were endowed with by the Creator--has naturally, and perhaps unfortunately in some regards, made observance an integral part of public policy not just personal life.

Posted by: oj at September 29, 2004 8:42 AM
« TALL MEN WON'T BE VOTING FOR HIM EITHER: | Main | CAN HE AFFORD TO MAKE IT CLEAR HE'S GEORGE McGOVERN WITH HAIR? (via Robert Schwartz): »