August 12, 2004
STILL HO'S HO:
Vietnam today (Jeff Jacoby, August 8, 2004, Boston Globe)
Few Americans have made an issue of Vietnam's harsh denial of political and religious liberty. One who has is Representative Chris Smith of New Jersey, author of a bill linking growth in US aid to Vietnam to "substantial progress" in Vietnam's human rights record. Smith's bill, the Vietnam Human Rights Act, passed the House by an overwhelming 410-1 vote in 2001. But it never got a hearing or a vote in the Senate, where it was blocked by the then-chairman of the East Asian and Pacific Affairs subcommittee -- John Kerry.Last month the House again passed Smith's bill, this time by 323 to 45. As in 2001, says Smith, the message of the bill is that "human rights are central -- they are at the core of our relationship with governments and the people they purport to represent."
Predictably, the vote sent Hanoi into high dudgeon, and it denounced Smith's legislation as "a gross interference into Vietnam's internal affairs." In truth, the bill would amount to little more than a slap on the wrist. It would have no effect on the roughly $40 million in foreign aid currently going to Vietnam every year. Only increases in that aid would be blocked, and only if they were earmarked for non-humanitarian purposes.
Opponents of the bill, like Kerry and Senator John McCain of Arizona, insist that the carrot of "engagement" will do more to nurture human rights in Vietnam than the stick of sanctions.
But that claim has been proven false by the experience of the last three years, Smith argues. Vietnam's treatment of dissidents and religious minorities has gotten worse, not better, since relations with the United States were normalized in 2001. The Vietnam Human Rights Act "would be law right now if it hadn't been for Kerry," Smith says, "and some of those dissidents would be out of prison." By blocking the sanctions bill three years ago, Kerry ensured only that Hanoi's repression would continue unabated.
Will he block it again this year? The Kerry campaign didn't reply to an inquiry as of late Friday, and Smith claims no inside knowledge. "But I know this much," he said the other day. "The best and brightest and bravest people in Vietnam are in prison, persecuted by the government for their opinions or their faith. And you don't do people who are suffering immeasurable cruelty any kindness by aiding a dictatorship."
Hasn't John Kerry harmed the Vietnamese people enough? Posted by Orrin Judd at August 12, 2004 11:08 AM
I hereby announce the Golden Zippo Award, awarded annually to the man or woman who does the most to keep the freedom-seeking peoples of Vietnam in chains. This year's winner, Senator John Kerry, for new recognition of his going above and beyond the call of duty during his four-month tour in the country in 1968-69. Mr. Kerry will receive the coveted Golden Zippo, engraved on one face with the likeness of Ho Chi Minh and on the other face with a likeness of himself, with a burning village and fleeing peasants in the background. Congratulations Senator Kerry! A duplicate of the Golden Zippo is being sent to the War Crimes Museum in Ho Chi Minh City.
Posted by: Georgie Gaudi at August 12, 2004 3:27 PMHe'll block it until they insert a clause to change the nam of Ho Chi Mihn City to Kerryville, they way they should have back in '75, those ungrateful wretches, after all he and Jane did for them to help win the Vietnam war already.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at August 12, 2004 5:35 PMAre there any prominent Vietnamese-American politicians or whatnot who can be given a speaking slot at the Convention? Sandwiched somewhere in between all the Iraqi/Afghani speakers, of course...
Posted by: brian at August 12, 2004 5:46 PMHe's not a politician, but might be Chief Justice one day: Viet Dinh.
Posted by: oj at August 12, 2004 5:48 PMWhy drag Don Ho into this?
Posted by: Robert Duquette at August 12, 2004 6:27 PM