August 13, 2004

DON'T HEAR MUCH FROM THE "GIVE THE SANCTIONS TIME TO WORK" CROWD:

Under Eye of U.N., Billions for Hussein in Oil-for-Food Plan (SUSAN SACHS and JUDITH MILLER, 8/13/04, NY Times)

Toward the end of 2000, when Saddam Hussein's skimming from the oil-for-food program for Iraq kicked into high gear, reports spread quickly to the program's supervisors at the United Nations.

Oil industry experts told Security Council members and Secretary General Kofi Annan's staff that Iraq was demanding under-the-table payoffs from its oil buyers. The British mission distributed a background paper to Council members outlining what it called "the systematic abuse of the program" and described how Iraq was shaking down its oil customers and suppliers of goods for kickbacks.

When the report landed in the United Nations' Iraq sanctions committee, the clearinghouse for all contracts with Iraq, it caused only a few ripples of consternation. There was no action, diplomats said, not even a formal meeting on the allegations.

Since the fall of Mr. Hussein, the oil-for-food program has received far more scrutiny than it ever did during its six years of operation. Congress's Government Accountability Office, formerly the General Accounting Office, has estimated that the Iraqi leader siphoned at least $10 billion from the program by illicitly trading in oil and collecting kickbacks from companies that had United Nations approval to do business with Iraq. Multiple investigations now under way in Washington and Iraq and at the United Nations all center on one straightforward question: How did Mr. Hussein amass so much money while under international sanctions? An examination of the program, the largest in the United Nations' history, suggests an equally straightforward answer: The United Nations let him do it.

"Everybody said it was a terrible shame and against international law, but there was really no enthusiasm to tackle it," said Peter van Walsum, a Dutch diplomat who headed the Iraq sanctions committee in 1999 and 2000, recalling the discussions of illegal oil surcharges. "We never had clear decisions on anything. So we just in effect condoned things."

As recently as February, the official position of the United Nations office that ran the program was that it learned of the endemic fraud only after it ended. But former officials and diplomats who dealt directly with the program now say the bribery and kickback racket was an open secret for years.

In blunt post-mortem assessments, they describe the program as a drifting ship - poorly designed, leaking money and controlled by a Security Council that was paralyzed by its own disputes over Iraq policy.


Mr. Kerry thinks we should have maintained it indefinitely.

Posted by Orrin Judd at August 13, 2004 10:58 PM
Comments

Well, given the Times' lightning-quick action in jumping on this story, I suppose we can expect the Christmas in Cambodia report to be making its appearance in the paper sometime around Thanksgiving...

Posted by: John at August 13, 2004 11:12 PM

Given Kerry's penchant for yielding to the UN this story should be made public by Bush. I think a survey recently had US approval rate of the UN in the 20s - more ammunition for Bush.

Posted by: AWW at August 13, 2004 11:37 PM

Just how long did it take the New York Times to report critically on the largest financial scandal in history? Remind me again of their motto?

Posted by: George at August 14, 2004 12:31 AM

George the motto of the New York Times is: "All the news that fits the DNC's agenda."

There is no liberal media.

There is no liberal media.

There is no liberal media.

[clicks heels of ruby slippers three times and returns to Kansas].

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at August 14, 2004 1:42 AM

Some cracking reporter from Tallahassee should ask Mr. Van Wolsum: "Who do you mean 'we', white boy"?

Posted by: ratbert at August 14, 2004 10:15 AM
« LEFT ISOLATION: | Main | THE STEREOTYPES JUST KEEP FALLING, HUH?: »