July 20, 2004
YEOMAN NATION:
Elegy Written in a Country Church-Yard: An illustrated version of Thomas Gray's 1751 poem (Harper's New Monthly Magazine, vol. 7, iss. 37, June 1853, Thomas Gray)
Some village Hampden, that, with dauntless breast,Posted by Orrin Judd at July 20, 2004 10:17 AM
The little tyrant of his fields withstood;
Some mute inglorious Milton,—here may rest,
Some Cromwell guiltless of his country's blood.
'Mute inglorious Milton' -- as I've said before, the most significant line of poetry in the language.
A great condemnation of religion, at least as practiced in England up to the 18th century.
A revised thought by Gray. The metaphor in the first version used a classical example.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at July 20, 2004 2:30 PMWhy would Milton have been any less Christian if he'd been a farmer?
Posted by: oj at July 20, 2004 2:38 PMHe'd have been illiterate. But the key word is not Milton but Miltons.
You wouldn't be blogging if religion had kept its stranglehold on human liberty.
As for Milton, he couldn't have been much less of a Christian than he was. He did a lot to cut the heart out of English Christianity.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at July 20, 2004 4:21 PMEver read him? Paradise Lost requires that we be "lowly wise", placing certain knowledge off limits because we're incapable of reckoning with it.
Posted by: oj at July 20, 2004 4:56 PMI thought he was really, really boring.
But, as you have so often pointed out to us, freedom of thought and education are poison to religion, and while nobody pays attention to 'Paradise Lost,' the infection of 'Areopagitica' pervades everything.
He may not have intended it -- although my college prof in the Milton course thought he did -- but we know what the road to hell is paved with.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at July 20, 2004 9:29 PMFreedom of education and thought aren't, statist education is because it's a competitor. That's well on its way to being taken care of though.
Posted by: oj at July 20, 2004 11:26 PMThen why has the Church always been terrified of having its members educated?
I know, you'll deny that's the case, but I will counter with the unanswerable argument: Acton
Posted by: Harry Eagar at July 21, 2004 4:00 PMThe Church educates its members.
Posted by: oj at July 21, 2004 4:04 PMThat would explain the educational levels prevalent in S. America, then?
Church schools are shams.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at July 22, 2004 12:23 AMCompulsory education is good, not state education.
Posted by: oj at July 22, 2004 7:38 AM