May 6, 2004

WINDTALK:

Rumsfeld Chastised by President for His Handling of Iraq Scandal (ELISABETH BUMILLER and RICHARD W. STEVENSON, 5/06/04, NY Times)

President Bush on Wednesday chastised his defense secretary, Donald H. Rumsfeld, for Mr. Rumsfeld's handling of a scandal over the American abuse of Iraqis held at a notorious prison in Baghdad, White House officials said.

The disclosures by the White House officials, under authorization from Mr. Bush, were an extraordinary display of finger-pointing in an administration led by a man who puts a high premium on order and loyalty. The officials said the president had expressed his displeasure to Mr. Rumsfeld in an Oval Office meeting because of Mr. Rumsfeld's failure to tell Mr. Bush about photographs of the abuse, which have enraged the Arab world.

In his interviews on Wednesday with Arab television networks, Mr. Bush said that he learned the graphic details of the abuse case only when they were broadcast last Wednesday on the CBS program "60 Minutes II." It was then, one White House official said, that Mr. Bush also saw the photographs documenting the abuse. "When you see the pictures," the official said, "it takes on a proportion of gravity that would require a much more extreme response than the way it was being handled."

Another White House official said, "The president was not satisfied or happy about the way he was informed about the pictures, and he did talk to Secretary Rumsfeld about it."

The disclosure of the dressing-down of the combative Mr. Rumsfeld was the first time that Mr. Bush has allowed his displeasure with a senior member of his administration to be made public. It also exposed the fault lines in Mr. Bush's inner circle that have deepened with the violence and political chaos in American-occupied Iraq.

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, who has often been at odds with Mr. Rumsfeld, went so far on Tuesday night as to talk about the prison abuse scandal in the context of the My Lai massacre of hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese men, women and children by American troops, a historical reference that was not in the White House talking points that sought to stem the damage from the scandal.

Mr. Powell, in an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live," brought up My Lai without prompting, saying that he served in Vietnam "after My Lai happened" and that "in war, these sorts of horrible things happen every now and again, but they're still to be deplored."


Does anyone at the Times understand bureaucratize at all? By comparing it to My Lai Secretary Powell is minimizing, not maximizing it.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 6, 2004 8:25 AM
Comments

These actions were certainly atrocious but seem to be getting blown out of proportion.
There is talk that Bush needs to fire Rumsfeld. I think this would be a huge mistake - there are many in the cabinet that should go before Rumsfeld (i.e. Mineta for one)

Posted by: AWW at May 6, 2004 8:29 AM

But My Lai is one of the high-water marks for the NYT: the press can exult in its moral superiority over the US military. For them, just thinking about My Lai brings back sweet memories.

Of course, they do not think about the tens of thousands of villagers murdered by the Viet Cong, or the millions of Cambodians murdered by the Khmer Rouge.

Posted by: jim hamlen at May 6, 2004 9:50 AM

jim:

That's how it's a coded message: his fans on the Left thinks he's damning the military, but his brothers in arms know his past history with My Lai.

Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 10:01 AM

I suspect the reality is:
- Bush, Powell, and Rumsfeld are all on the same page and working together;
- Powell brought up My Lai to encourage Vietnam comparisons because they want John Kerry, who confessed in 1971 to war crimes, to throw the administration in that briar patch;
- Bush and Rumsfeld are playing a good cop / bad cop routine where Rumsfeld takes the fall for Bush;
- The Times reporters have a fair idea what's going on but they report it the way it's given to them in order to maintain their access; and because it lets them put a different negative spin - disarray in the Bush administration.

Posted by: pj at May 6, 2004 10:17 AM

I knew we'd lost in Vietnam when My Lai resulted in war crimes trials.

Only the losing side gets nailed for war crimes. And the winning side does the nailing.

Posted by: Ken at May 6, 2004 12:14 PM

There's not another prison in the Middle East where prisoners are treated as well as the mistreated prisoners in Baghdad.

Posted by: ed at May 6, 2004 7:26 PM

ed:

I especially like the stuff about simulated sodomy. If we're gonna have all this fuss about simulations what'll we do about real torture?

Posted by: oj at May 6, 2004 7:36 PM
« AS LONG AS WE HAVE PLANES IN THE VICINITY...: | Main | RED TIDE: »