May 10, 2004

SPAIN'S SHAME:

Spanish troops return home with regrets (Charles M. Sennott, May 10, 2004, Boston Globe)

"It didn't really feel like that much of a homecoming for us. It felt more like a political celebration for Zapatero and those who never wanted us there in the first place," said Manuel Garcia, 31, a sergeant in a brigade that was among the entire Spanish contingent of 1,300 troops ordered home. [...]

While all of the soldiers interviewed said they were relieved to be home and out of the harrowing dangers of serving in Iraq, most of them - even some originally opposed to the war - also expressed regret over Zapatero's decision. They said they were forced to abandon what they felt was a useful humanitarian mission. During their time on the ground, they said, they saw a profound need for international troops to stabilize the chaos and violence of postwar Iraq.

"We should have stayed and finished our mission," said José Francisco Casteneda, 29, who was among four sergeants who had gathered at a local restaurant Thursday - sharing newly developed snapshots of their time in Iraq.

The soldiers grumbled about what they viewed as the staged homecoming. They said that on the day they arrived, they were not given a rest but put through a training exercise for the ceremony the following morning. They said that many fellow soldiers, who had come back in the earlier wave of troop charters back home, were on vacations with their families when they were ordered back to base for the ceremony. The television footage of the ceremony shows Zapatero flashing a broad smile that political cartoonists love to lampoon. The soldiers said they couldn't hide their disappointment that the prime minister did not directly address them and left it to the defense minister, José Bono. "A lot of us were wondering, 'Who is this parade for anyway?'" Collado asked.

Cesar Royo, 29, a communications specialist for the brigade who had just returned to his bride, said he was among more than 90 percent of Spaniards who surveys suggest were against the invasion and Aznar's decision to send troops to support the effort. But Royo also said he came away from his experience with a sense that the Spanish troops had something important to contribute, and he felt their mission was cut short in a way that smells of retreat and feels less than noble.

"America's reason for going to war was cynical," he said. "But when you are there on the ground, you see the poverty and people living in mud houses next to Saddam's palaces," he said, and "the work we were doing seems justified. It had valor." Most Spaniards disagree that the war has "valor." Jesus Nuñez, director of the Institute of Studies on Conflicts and Humanitarian Action, which is in Madrid, said: "This was a military mission camouflaged as a humanitarian mission. Sure, they were working in the schools, and in infrastructure projects, but let us understand that was just a tag-on." He added: "The former government had an interest in making it look like the troops were there to give humanitarian aid, because they knew nobody welcomed the idea of Spain being in a war."


If you're in need of aid do you care why it's being given?

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 10, 2004 7:22 AM
Comments

Our cynical reasons for war aren't working out too well -- oil is $40 a barrel now.

Or, one could take him at his word when he says things like "freedom is God's gift to humanity".

How obtuse do you have to be to insist that the first is the truth, over the version that has spoken intentions matching actions?

Posted by: Jeff Brokaw at May 10, 2004 8:36 AM

"him" meaning GWB of course ...

Posted by: Jeff Brokaw at May 10, 2004 8:41 AM

Jeff
I agree of course, but the anti-war types were never able to actually say how it was about oil. You suggest it was to keep oil down in price (but that could have been acheived by buying more oil from Saddam, in other words breaking our own sanctions). Other's have suggested it was to keep the oil price higher, so that Bush's friends could reap greater profits. If the later is the case, then we have wasted alot of money, time, and manpower trying to increase the oil production in Iraq.

There will never be a way to prove the leftists (meaning John Kerry also) wrong, since they have managed to take both sides of the issue.

Posted by: h-man at May 10, 2004 10:38 AM

h -

Yes, and they scurry from one issue to another whenever it's convenient. Sort of like the media. And my 2 year old.

Posted by: Jeff Brokaw at May 10, 2004 11:44 AM

Soldados de Espana:

Bienvenidos a Vietnam.

Posted by: Ken at May 10, 2004 12:37 PM

"America's reasons for going to war were cynical."

Having lived there for many years, I can tell you that the national pasttime of Spain (I mean besides sleeping, dancing and hanging out in bars) is Anti-Americanism. What's worse than being a has-been nation? An almost could've been again.

America: "Let's roll"
Spain: Let's Rrrrroll over."

Posted by: Jose Hangout, Jr. at May 10, 2004 3:24 PM
« CAN THE AMBULANCE CHASERS BE FAR BEHIND?: | Main | HELLO, MY NAME IS INIGO BUSH...: »