April 5, 2004
OVER BY EASTER?:
Missourians echoing views from Bush ads (Susan Page, 4/04/04, USA TODAY)
Bill Hoskins is a Democrat who plans to vote for John Kerry. But ask the 42-year-old truck driver the first thing that comes to mind when he thinks about his party's presidential candidate, and out pops "flip-flopper.""Wearing his badge of valor as far as being a veteran," says Laura Scoville, 47, a middle school teacher and undecided voter who tends to vote Republican. "But I'm worried about taxes."
"I do know he's voted to raise gas taxes several times," says Brian Nikkel, 25, an insurance claims adjuster. "I know that from the Bush commercials."
Conversations with voters in this St. Louis suburb signal that the Bush campaign seems to be achieving its early goal: Define Kerry in a negative way with voters in battleground states before he has a chance to make a positive first impression. Seven months before Election Day, voters who know little else about the Massachusetts senator are echoing Bush's ads.
There's no easier political sell than the truth. Posted by Orrin Judd at April 5, 2004 9:02 AM
Mr. Judd;
You mean like you can't tax less and spend more? That kind of truth?
Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at April 5, 2004 9:33 AMAOG:
That's a falsehood, which is why those who say it are ignored rather than killed.
Posted by: oj at April 5, 2004 9:38 AMthose st. louis people have alot more common sense than the sf, ca people I'm used to!
Posted by: neil at April 5, 2004 9:49 AMThe first person notes that he still plans to vote for Kerry. I still believe Kerry will get at least 40% of the vote due to the Anybody but Bush mentality on the left. The question is whether Kerry can get enough moderates to put him over Bush.
Posted by: AWW at April 5, 2004 9:52 AMThere's no easier political sell than the truth.
I don't know about that. The reason politicians are liars is because the public doesn't like hearing the truth.
Posted by: M Ali Choudhury at April 5, 2004 10:09 AMAli -
Both you and oj would be right if the pols opponent can be counted on telling the truth about him/her. That's why I have nothing against so-called negative ads if they are truthful.
Posted by: MG at April 5, 2004 10:42 AMInteresting that framing Kerry as a tax raiser is viewed as "negative." Shouldn't it be a positive to Dems? If the Bush tax cuts are so horribly wrong, shouldn't Kerry be delighted that the Bush camp is championing his repeated voting for increased taxes?
Posted by: John Resnick at April 5, 2004 12:50 PMSpeaking as a resident of the Show-me state let me affirm the effectiveness of GW's commercials so far. Though a Bush supporter, I had been a little nervous about his chances in Missouri which should be a battleground state this year. The last several weeks though, starting with the ad saying JFK will raise taxes by $900 billion in his first 100 days, the independents and conservative democrats have begun to drift toward GW. If I recall correctly, a recent poll here showed Bush with a 7 point lead over Kerry among registered voters.
Midwesterners are very conscious of Easterners, especially New Englanders, talking down to them and seeming inauthentic. Kerry's rather distant and disengaged demeanor don't help him much and even those who plan to vote for him aren't really ardent supporters. Many union people I know plan to vote for Bush because he's pro-life and seen as no worse on the unions than Kerry, plus his tax cuts have helped out several of their families with bills. I don't think the race will be all that close in November, not any more.
Posted by: Robert Modean at April 5, 2004 3:36 PM) Because irony can also refer to other kinds of coach handbag incongruity, can't it? Like for instance incongruities massage chair of reception, the fact that you like a track for contact lens certain reasons which are quite different from what purse its makers "intended," you like something that in handbag some sense isn't really for you. (Yeah, I know, ionic breeze intentional fallacy, but I think that's pretty unavoidable designer handbag
Posted by: Replica handbag at May 4, 2004 5:24 PM