November 14, 2003

LEAVING SOME NAILS UNPOUNDED:

The Evolution Of Tom DeLay (Richard E. Cohen, Nov. 14, 2003, National Journal)

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, and Rep. Jim Greenwood, R-Pa., are poles apart when it comes to federal policy on abortion. The moderate Greenwood is one of the few House Republicans who support abortion rights, a stance that DeLay and fellow conservatives traditionally haven't tolerated. So it may seem surprising that Greenwood sings DeLay's praises for his handling of this year's debate on the "partial-birth" abortion bill.

When the House had debated similar legislation in previous years, Republican leaders denied Greenwood and his allies the opportunity to offer an amendment on the floor permitting legal exceptions to an outright ban on the controversial abortion procedure. Early this year, Greenwood and moderate Rep. Nancy Johnson, R-Conn., took their plea to DeLay and reminded him of their party loyalty as senior members who have worked on other key issues. Recognizing that the request was vital to a small Republican cadre, DeLay acquiesced. He single-handedly overrode objections from other GOP conservatives and allowed House debate on the amendment.

"In rising through the leadership, Tom DeLay has recognized that he needs to keep the entire [House Republican] Conference on board," Greenwood said in an interview. "He has figured out how to be an outspoken leader of conservatives, and still represent all Republicans. I respect that."

True, DeLay's decision was made easier because he was confident -- and correct -- that the House would defeat the amendment, sponsored by Greenwood and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md. But the key point is that even though other Republicans had routinely rejected the moderates' request, DeLay took it seriously. "He respects that I have had to make some tough votes [on other bills], and that I expect to be treated as a member of the team," Greenwood added.

Not long ago, DeLay, too, would probably have dismissed Greenwood's request. During eight years as House majority whip, from 1995 through 2002, DeLay made himself famous as a snarling, highly partisan enforcer, with little stomach for those who didn't share his conservative fervor.

But now that DeLay has served as House majority leader for the past year, it is apparent that he has undergone something of an evolution. He has polished his public image and taken pains to portray himself as a disciplined, measured leader who is responsive to all types of House Republicans as he sets the agenda, hones strategy, and brokers deals.

"He has grown and reached out to members," said Rep. Jennifer Dunn, R-Wash. Likewise, Rep. Ray LaHood, R-Ill., said that in DeLay's new role, "Tom's strongest point has been his ability to reach out to members, one-on-one." In his first year as House majority leader, Tom DeLay has gone from a snarling enforcer to a measured strategist. But The Hammer hasn't gone soft. He's positioning himself for the speakership. [...]

The next obvious step for DeLay is the speakership. But he won't need to make that decision until the 61-year-old Hastert creates a vacancy. In January, House Republicans abolished their eight-year limit on the speaker's term, and Hastert has appeared intent on holding his post. "As long as I can achieve something," Hastert told National Journal during an interview in May, "I'll do this job." Some of those close to Hastert say he will not step down before Bush departs, given their close relationship.

But other House Republican insiders suggest that Hastert is "tired." They point to his announcement this summer that he will publish his memoirs early next year as a signal that he might step down within the year. Another camp contends that he might leave after one more term, possibly to take an ambassadorial post.


The GOP is rapidly approaching the day--thanks in no small parts to the 5+ TX seats Mr. DeLay just got them--when it will be able to more easily afford to have an ideaologue in the Speaker's chair again.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 14, 2003 1:34 PM
Comments

One of things Bush has always been in politics -- and this may or may not be Karl Rove's doing -- is low-key, a public face that also applies to Hastert and to Frist. Given the normal media ideoloigcal bent, adopting that position prevents the press from having any visual or verbal actualities to "expose" the mean-spirited Republicans, and leaves the Democrats to sputter and attempt to project their own feelings as those of their opponents (hence all the fraudulent statements about Iraq they attribute to Bush).

DeLay was really the only "hot" type left among the Republican leadership in D.C. If he cools down and is no longer providing the networks with verbal red meat for 2004, the Democrats' hysteria over GOP "hidden agendas" will get even worse than it is now.

Posted by: John at November 14, 2003 3:05 PM

DeLay did not "undergo[] something of an evolution." He is smart enough to realize that the job of Whip is not the same as the job of Majority Leader, and that the two posts require different management styles in order to be effective. I wouldn't be surprised that if he did become Speaker, we would once again see a transformation in the eyes of some people who again don't realize that DeLay is smart enough to see the differences in that job, too. I would be surprised if he achieved the Speakership, that he would revert to "the Hammer."


Posted by: Raoul Ortega at November 14, 2003 3:45 PM

DeLay will have his problems, because the left will hate him like it hated Gingrich, but he won't repeat Newt's mistakes.

Posted by: jim hamlen at November 14, 2003 3:59 PM

Newt's only mistake was in being too smart for the job.

After his Contract with America was so effective in bringing the Republicans back into House power, the Left targeted him for destruction.

Posted by: John J. Coupal at November 14, 2003 5:31 PM

John:

Newt, (whom I tremendously admire), self-destructed.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at November 14, 2003 6:10 PM

Having lived in his district at the time, yes, he did himself in. Certainly he was despised and attacked, but if he had been as patient as Bush and as cheerful as Reagan (and self-disciplined), he would still be Speaker today.

Posted by: jim hamlen at November 15, 2003 1:59 AM

I agree. Newt's temperament did him in. At least in House leadership. However his entrepreneurial spirit is now seen in -among other things -remaking the American healthcare system.

No small feat. He must have been an overachiever most of his life.

Posted by: John J. Coupal at November 15, 2003 3:25 AM
« CRANK UP THE VCR (via Mr. Whipsnaade): | Main | SIMPLE COERCION: »