November 18, 2003
HOW LITTLE WE KNOW:
Thunderstorm Research Shocks Conventional Theories ; Florida Tech Physicist Throws Open Debate On Lightning's Cause (Science Daily, 2003-11-06)
If Joseph Dwyer, Florida Tech associate professor of physics, is right, then a lot of what we thought we knew about thunderstorms and lightning is probably wrong. [...]The problem is scientists have searched inside thunderstorms for many years, looking for these large electric fields, only to come up empty handed. Some researchers have suggested that maybe we haven't been looking hard enough; maybe the big electric fields are really there, but they were somehow just missed. Now, Dwyer's new theory shows that these searches were actually in vain; super-sized fields simply don't exist, period.
"What we've discovered is a new limit in nature. Just as a bucket can only hold so much water, the atmosphere can only hold a certain sized electric field. Beyond that, the electric field is stunted by the rapid creation of gamma-rays and a form of anti-matter called positrons," he said.
While Dwyer's research shows that lightning is not produced by large, unseen electric fields inside storms, the triggering mechanism remains a mystery.
"Although everyone is familiar with lightning, we still don't know much about how it really works," said Dwyer.
Notice the phraseology: "a lot of what we thought we knew...is probably wrong." Not "a lot of what we thought", but "a lot of what we thought we knew". Posted by Orrin Judd at November 18, 2003 6:20 PM
I wonder if this could lead to a more effective method of creating and harvesting anti-matter ?
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at November 18, 2003 11:49 PMThe harvesting of that anti-matter will be done using an anti-combine.
Posted by: John J. Coupal at November 19, 2003 3:21 PM