IF YOU HAD A RIGHT TO PRIVACY IT WOULDN'T BE CALLED PUBLIC:

Protect Our Right to Anonymity (JEFFREY ROSEN, 9/12/11, NY Times)

IN November, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could redefine the scope of privacy in an age of increasingly ubiquitous surveillance technologies like GPS devices and face-recognition software.

The case, United States v. Jones, concerns a GPS device that the police, without a valid warrant, placed on the car of a suspected drug dealer in Washington, D.C. The police then tracked his movements for a month and used the information to convict him of conspiracy to sell cocaine. The question before the court is whether this violated the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures of our "persons, houses, papers, and effects."

It's imperative that the court says yes. Otherwise, Americans will no longer be able to expect the same degree of anonymity in public places that they have rightfully enjoyed since the founding era.

Which Federalist Paper was it that showed how the Constitution would guarantee our anonymity?

Posted by oj at September 13, 2011 7:03 AM
Tweet   

Follow @brothersjudd