May 1, 2009

THOUGH THE POINT ABOUT PARTISANSHIP IS RIGHT...:

Security Before Politics (Porter J. Goss, April 25, 2009, Washington Post)

Since leaving my post as CIA director almost three years ago, I have remained largely silent on the public stage. I am speaking out now because I feel our government has crossed the red line between properly protecting our national security and trying to gain partisan political advantage. We can't have a secret intelligence service if we keep giving away all the secrets. [...]

Today, I am slack-jawed to read that members claim to have not understood that the techniques on which they were briefed were to actually be employed; or that specific techniques such as "waterboarding" were never mentioned. It must be hard for most Americans of common sense to imagine how a member of Congress can forget being told about the interrogations of Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed. In that case, though, perhaps it is not amnesia but political expedience.

Let me be clear. It is my recollection that:

-- The chairs and the ranking minority members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, known as the Gang of Four, were briefed that the CIA was holding and interrogating high-value terrorists.

-- We understood what the CIA was doing.

-- We gave the CIA our bipartisan support.

-- We gave the CIA funding to carry out its activities.

-- On a bipartisan basis, we asked if the CIA needed more support from Congress to carry out its mission against al-Qaeda.

I do not recall a single objection from my colleagues.


...the broader case he's making actually argues against a secret intelligence service. If it weren't secret Democrats couldn't deny supporting it.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 1, 2009 7:44 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« "NO, MR. PRESIDENT, WE DON'T AGREE": | Main | THIS HAVING JUST WON A MAGAZINE AWARD...: »