July 1, 2008

WHICH IS WHY WE SHOULD HAVE DONE THE USSR, BUT THE VOTERS WILL DO THIS REGIME CHANGE FOR US:

'Weak' Iran ripe to be attacked (Gareth Porter, 7/01/08, Asia Times)

New arguments by analysts close to Israeli thinking in favor of United States strikes against Iran cite evidence of Iranian military weakness in relation to the US and Israel, and even raise doubts that Iran is rushing to obtain such weapons at all.

The new arguments contradict Israel's official argument that it faces an "existential threat" from an Islamic extremist Iranian regime determined to get nuclear weapons. They suggest that Israel, which already has as many as 200 nuclear weapons, views Iran from the position of the dominant power in the region rather than as the weaker state in the relationship.

The existence of a sharp imbalance of power in favor of Israel and the United States is the main premise of a recent analysis by Patrick Clawson and Michael Eisenstadt of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) suggesting that a US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities is feasible. Chuck Freilich, a senior fellow at Harvard University's Belfer Center on Science and International Affairs, has also urged war against Iran on such a power imbalance.


Just because it wouldn't be challenging doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 1, 2008 8:27 AM

What the writer is saying is that Israel looks at Iran from across the military threshold, more or less like England regarding the Fuzzy-Wuzzies at Omdurman, but we already knew that.

Posted by: Lou Gots at July 1, 2008 11:58 AM

The Brits only ever got hysterical about Napleon and Hitler though.

Posted by: oj at July 1, 2008 2:53 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« SO THATCHER AND REAGAN ENDED HISTORY...: | Main | THE ANGLOSPHERE WITH AN ACCENT: »