July 24, 2008

THE BASIC ECONOMICS OF BREAKING WINDOWS:

The Real Question: Should Oil Be Cheap?: Expensive oil hurts, but there's a business case to be made for a floor under the price of crude (John Carey, 7/23/08, Business Week)

[A]mite Foundry's resurgence is just one of countless examples of a deeper truth: Expensive energy, in many ways, is good. Why? When the price of oil goes up, people will use less, find substitutes, and develop new supplies. Those effects are just basic economics. Things are so painful now, many economists say, because of the past two decades of cheap oil. Prices stayed low in part because they didn't reflect the full cost of extras such as pollution, so there was little incentive to use energy more wisely. If those extras had been counted, the country would be better prepared for both today's soaring prices and the day that global oil production begins to decline.

That's why there is growing interest, from both the left and right, in a policy that uses taxes to put a floor under the price of oil. Above a certain level—say $90—there would be no tax. But if the world market price dropped below that, taxes would kick in to make U.S. users pay the target amount.

Expensive energy is a powerful medicine. It may hurt when taken, but it brings long-term cures for a host of ills. It compels companies and people to put fewer miles on the car, ditch the SUV, or install more efficient heating, as Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor did: The hospital saves $1 million annually with a system it installed two years ago. Higher costs are beginning to nudge America away from its traditional traffic-congested suburban sprawl to denser, less car-dependent communities. Utah has a government-sponsored bike-to-work program. "When the Republican governor of the reddest state in the union is promoting bicycling as a preferred mode of transportation, you know people are paying attention to the price signals," says Keith Bartholomew, professor of urban planning at the University of Utah.

These changes are saving lives—fewer traffic deaths—and improving health as people get out of their cars. A study from Washington University in St. Louis suggests that 8% of the rise in obesity since the 1980s was due to low gas prices, which led to less walking and biking and more restaurant meals. Silicon Valley engineer Andy King parked his Chevy Suburban in favor of a bike for commuting and says he has dropped 35 pounds since February. "It's good for my body and soul," King says.

High energy prices also water the flowers of innovation, making investments in alternatives pay off and juicing the search for more oil. [...]

With oil demand slowing and supplies headed up, prices are off more than $20 from their July 11 record of $147.27. "I don't think anyone believes prices that high were here to stay," says Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist A. Denny Ellerman.

Just as the low prices of the late 1980s and '90s undid some positive effects of expensive oil, the mere possibility that prices could fall is weakening the market forces pushing toward greater energy efficiency. What really drives behavior is not the actual price, but the perception of where costs will be over the long term.


Posted by Orrin Judd at July 24, 2008 7:59 AM

This is why rising gas prices isn't inflation, but has nothing to do with your loony breaking windows for the common good theory.

Posted by: Ibid at July 24, 2008 9:42 AM

Yes, you can only keep gas prices high by artificial means, like taxes, cartel, or speculation. One rewards America, one dictatorships, one crooks.

Posted by: oj at July 24, 2008 10:20 AM

Rising gas prices only reward America if the increases are due to taxes and the money raised is used to lower other taxes or fix entitlement programs with private accounts. Otherwise, we are rewarding the dictatorships and fighting inflation with little benefit to the US. If we produce more oil to lower the price, we could then raise gas taxes and accomplish great things with the revenue. Not that I expect that to happen.

Posted by: Patrick H at July 24, 2008 11:09 AM

Just make sure the windfall that results when oil drops back to $70 doesn't go straight into pork.

Posted by: Mike Earl at July 24, 2008 12:16 PM

Why? Is pork less fattening when you use income taxes?

Posted by: oj at July 24, 2008 1:12 PM

Higher prices are good. Higher prices caused by consumption taxes are better.

Posted by: oj at July 24, 2008 1:15 PM

Higher prices that, by your own admission, reward dictators and/or crooks and lead to inflation are good? You lost me there.

Posted by: Patrick H at July 24, 2008 1:28 PM

OJ:

No, but a sudden increase in tax revenues is especially likely to be spent on something useless.

Posted by: Mike Earl at July 24, 2008 2:11 PM

Our taxes spent on "something useless" is far better than Saudi's OPEC wind falls spent on financing jihadists.

We work our tails off and surrender our hard earned wealth to the Arabs, who sit on their fat asses, buying our banks, ports, and whatnots, and financing jihadists to murder us. It is stupid to make us slave for Arab oils.

Posted by: ic at July 24, 2008 3:02 PM

Taxes never increase or decrease--we just tax different stuff.

Posted by: oj at July 24, 2008 4:24 PM

not rewarding dictators makes the better

Posted by: oj at July 24, 2008 4:26 PM

Oil prices were too low for too long. Please forgive the self-referential link:

http://www.fundmasteryblog.com/2008/07/10/oil-prices-too-low-for-too-long/

Posted by: Kurt Brouwer at July 24, 2008 6:26 PM

The problem being that it is profitable at that low price.

Posted by: oj at July 24, 2008 7:48 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« HERE'S HOW IT WON'T END...: | Main | WE HAD A DREAM: »