July 30, 2008

BUT FOR THAT DUI IT WOULD BE EVERY ELECTION:

The "No-Bounce" Win and a Bit of History (Steve Lombardo, 7/29/08, Pollster.com)

With little in the way of new polling data--and the milestone of 100 days until Election Day passing--we decided to take a look at where the race stood at this time over the past five election cycles. While this was an unscientific review, we did try and choose the most representative polls (from reputable pollsters) that we could find. The trend from 1988 - 2004 shows that the GOP candidate tends to under-poll in the summer--with the exception, as you can see below, of the 2000 campaign. In each of the other four years, the Republican candidate had been polling significantly behind the Democrat at this point in the race. Each of those times, however, the Republican improved his position, gaining an average of 15 points relative to the Democrat.

That is a staggering number: equivalent to over 18 million votes based on 2004 turnout numbers. So Republicans have come back before--and McCain's campaign narrative does fit with the "comeback kid" storyline--but what this means for 2008 is difficult to say. It could tell us that Republican candidates tend to do better once the electorate is more focused on the issues and the candidates (similar to what we see in registered voter/likely voter screens, where likely voters--those paying more attention--tend to be slightly more inclined to vote for the Republican candidate), or it could simply be a coincidence based on a variety of external factors related to those particular races and polls. Either way, it's interesting to look at:


The dynamics of every election is the same--once the GOP explains who the Democratic nominee is the voters react unfavorably.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 30, 2008 8:30 AM

The explanation is quite simple. There are lots of conservative Democrats who say in the summer that they want to vote for a Democrat. Then on election day they reliably vote for the more conservative (i.e., Republican) candidate.

Posted by: b at July 30, 2008 11:28 AM

I wonder how many Capitol Hill democrats would vote for Obama. I wonder whom Hill and Bill would vote for. Pelosi would rather be the top bitch Democrat, and Reid be the dog. Why would they want a president over them? Worse of all, they would not have anybody to blame but themselves when things go wrong, Obamessiah will always be blamesless. They may even lose their own jobs in 2010. They need a Republican to take the flaks.

Posted by: ic at July 30, 2008 1:27 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« DON'T CARRY THE MESSAGE, CARRY THEM: | Main | GOOD FASTBALL, GOOD SLIDER, HIS GOOGLY IS HIS OUT PITCH...: »