June 1, 2008

ABEL NEEDED KILLING (via Ed Driscoll):

When Worlds Collide: The American past meets modern museum doctrine. (P.J. O'Rourke, 06/09/2008, Weekly Standard)

The Ancient Americas
The Field Museum
Permanent Exhibit

The Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago has a new permanent exhibit of savagery and barbarism, "The Ancient Americas." The ancient Americans themselves are not portrayed as savage or barbarous. (How surprising. Knock me over with a feather.) The savages and barbarians are the museum's curators. They plunder history, ravage archaeology, do violence to intelligence, and lay waste to wisdom, faith, and common sense. [...]

When I was in the fourth grade, some 50 years ago, my grandmother would take me to the Field Museum. It was a solemn, quiet, awe-engendering place. All of creation's wonders were on display in orderly ranks. Dim corridors were lined with dioramas featuring important animals, shot, stuffed, and carefully labeled. Further corridors held wonders of a sterner kind: Sinister masks from Africa, demon deities of the heathen Raj, alarming Sung Dynasty figurines depicting the exquisite tortures of Chinese hell. Whatever steadiness of nerve I now possess I owe to steeling myself to walk past the display case containing an unwrapped Egyptian mummy.

The Field Museum was interesting even in its least interesting parts. The section devoted to Useful Varieties of Wood fascinated me in the exactitude of its tediousness. The world was full of things and--if I could summon the patience and concentration--those things could be organized, understood, and made to serve a purpose.

The museum fueled every worthy ambition. The mineralogical collection made me decide to become a man of learning and means sufficient to lead an expedition to find an immense amethyst geode, which I would present to Jennifer Riley, she of the auburn hair in my fourth grade class, one row over and two desks up. And the large, gloomy hall devoted to life in the Arctic was a religious inspiration. I looked at the full-scale cutaway of winter quarters in MacKenzie Bay, where you lived in an underground room the size of a Buick, wore itchy seal skins, ate raw whale and breathed the smoke of a Caribou chip fire.

I would bow my head and intone, "Praise God for not making me an Eskimo."

Then Grandmother and I would go to lunch in the museum's cafeteria, an austere room that served school food of the better kind--much as the White House Mess does to this day. Over this comforting fare I would quiz my own family's ancient American.

"Grandma, what's the difference between Democrats and Republicans?"

"Democrats rent."

"Grandma, what's wrong with the people in the bad neighborhoods that we saw from the 'El'?"

"No one is ever so poor that he can't pick up his yard."

"Grandma, which Roosevelt was worse, Teddy or Franklin?"

"Theodore. He had no business meddling in things the way he did after your great-grandfather's friend Mr. McKinley died, and he divided the Republican party, allowing that scallywag Woodrow Wilson to become the president."

One of the best pleasures of my childhood was to walk hand-in-hand with my grandmother up the broad flights of marble steps to the towering bronze doors of the Field Museum. The doors are closed now. The main entrance to the museum is no longer used. These days that neoclassical portico with its view of Loop, lakefront, and Grant Park grandeur probably makes people feel small. The back door has more room for tour buses and handicapped ramps. Grandeur is out of style anyway. The Field Museum was built for Chicago's Columbian Exposition, celebrating (if you can imagine celebrating such a thing) Columbus's "discovery" of America. It wasn't the happiest 400th anniversary for ancient Americans.

The museum is full of noisy children and their caregivers, blended families, and whatever else we're calling kith and kin these days. A long, mouse-maze, airport security-style line must be endured to get tickets. The sculpture of a Masai spearman facing off against a crouching lioness has been shunted to a lonely corner, lest someone somehow take offense. Nowadays offense is taken--snatched and grabbed--as if offense were something valuable to own. And given our umbrage-filled presidential campaign, maybe it is. The brontosaurus has been pushed to the back (that is to say the front) of the main hall and isn't called a brontosaurus anymore. (Doubtless offense was taken by Chicago's Bronto-American community.) Nor is the skeleton of this vast vegan any longer engaged in post-mortem mortal combat with the bones of a tyrannosaurus rex. Modern kids are too loving and caring about dinosaurs to be exposed to such scenes of domestic violence.

Most of the minerals and all of the useful woods have been replaced by a gift shop the size of Macy's (appropriately enough, since Macy's is now the name on Marshall Field's, the department store whose founder was the Field Museum's patron). The cafeteria is gone; a McDonald's has been installed. At least people are still dressed the way I was a half-century ago: In jeans or shorts, T-shirts, and gym shoes. Except these are people of 40 or 50. Indeed, some are as old as my grandmother was when she, in hat and gloves, escorted me. And Grandma had visited the Field Museum during the Columbian Exposition.

I couldn't see what the children are wearing; they are misbehaving blurs to my bifocaled eyes. None seems afraid to walk past the mummy case. I didn't have the heart. Unwrapped as he is, the mummy fits in too well, sartorially, with a 21st-century crowd. At the portal of the "Ancient Americas" exhibit is the first of many, many wall inscriptions telling you what you should be thinking, if you happen to do any of that.

The Ancient Americas is a story of diversity and change--not progress.

Were this a criticism of pre-Columbian societies, you'd be in for an interesting experience. It isn't. You aren't. [...]

This brings us to the Maya and their abominable customs, nicely glossed.

.  .  . sacrifice has played a role in the religious beliefs of many people throughout history and in all parts of the world. .  .  . Even today almost all world religions include sacrifice of some kind in their spiritual practices.

Now wait a damn minute, you infidel apes of social science. Shut your brie holes and listen up. God, the God, the God who didn't make me an Eskimo, does not require human sacrifice, he suffers it: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."


I'm a big fan of Tony Horwitz but had to let the tiger out of the cage on his most recent book, A Voyage Long and Strange, because it too is one long exercise in pretending that the Conquest was some kind of tragedy in which we displaced cultural peers.

Colgate Freshman used to take a seminar on a discrete and unusual topic--it was supposed to be a break from the core requirements and other stuff you were inundated with. Class size was even smaller than usual. Anyway, having not gotten any of my 8 choices I was assigned "American Indian Life Histories," taught by the anthropologist Gary Urton and seated around a conference table with a bunch of kids who'd worked on Indian reservations as volunteers in high school. We'd read these "autobiographies" -- not that any of the subjects even had a written language -- of turn of the century natives and learn about their profoundly squalid existences, then get together in class and weep and moan about what we'd done to them.

One day I couldn't take it anymore and asked: "You all do realize that we're talking about people who hadn't even figured out the wheel yet?" Suffice it to say, that was poorly received.

Posted by Orrin Judd at June 1, 2008 11:36 PM
Comments

Speaking of violence in Ancient Americas, I just saw Apocalypto. A totally engrossing film, a cross between Quest for Fire and The Naked Prey. And I mean that in the most complimentary way. I can see why the PC types hated it, but I think it's a classic.

Posted by: PapayaSF at June 2, 2008 1:09 AM

So, um, are we our brothers' keepers?

Or not?

Posted by: Barry Meislin at June 2, 2008 2:57 AM

Just because we are our brothers' keepers, we are bound to lead him up out of his loved Egyptim night, to rescue him from his own sloth and heathen folly.

This is even so, though our reward is blame and hate.

Posted by: Lou Gots at June 2, 2008 4:05 AM

Abel wasn't our brother. He was prelapsarian man.

Posted by: oj at June 2, 2008 4:23 AM

Thanks P.J. for another interesting and pithy observation, putting to word something this very un- P.C. former history teacher has been talking about for years. I argued this same case against the independence movement in Hawaii. Compare the Hawaiian Islands with the Cook Islands for lifestyle, governance and accomplishment....

Posted by: Steve Campbell at June 2, 2008 5:18 AM

Ah, so now we're rewriting the Bible....

Posted by: Barry Meislin at June 2, 2008 5:46 AM

just re-reading it

Posted by: Shelton at June 2, 2008 9:50 AM

Of course the crucifixion was a human sacrifice. It was meant to curb a jealous god's retaliation for a faustian act. That it is reenacted only with ritual consumption of body and blood and not the real thing is the true advance of Christianity.

Posted by: BillB at June 2, 2008 9:55 AM

No, it was Deicide, not just homicide, which is why it matters utterly. The point at which God despaired on the Cross reconciled Him to man.

Posted by: oj at June 2, 2008 12:40 PM

Why did you think God let Cain walk? It was His own guilt.

Posted by: oj at June 2, 2008 12:42 PM

So God resurrected himself? Not much of a death then, trivializing the sacrifice. If he became reconciled to man, then wasn't that the purpose of the human sacrifice?
What would be the source of God's guilt in letting Cain walk? A human parent or boss for example, might be ashamed of withholding out of petty jealousy.

Posted by: Billb at June 2, 2008 2:17 PM

The Resurrection isn't important. The Crucifixion is.

Yes, God was ashamed at repeating His mistake from the Garden, favoring prelapsarian Man over post. Man confused Him terribly.

Posted by: oj at June 2, 2008 3:55 PM

Those sort of impressive entrances never made me feel small, they actually make me feel important, going through such a grand entrance into the building. Welcome guests come through the front entrance.

Posted by: Mikey at June 2, 2008 4:48 PM

oj,
"Yes, God was ashamed "
I now know I'll never understand your Faith nor your thinking. Yeah, I know, my loss yadda, yadda!
And, please, spare me one of your cryptic, virtually nonsensical, responses.
Mike

Posted by: Mike at June 2, 2008 11:31 PM

done

Posted by: oj at June 3, 2008 4:14 AM
« YOU CAN HARDLY BE SURPRISED...: | Main | WHICH MISSES THE MAIN REASON: »