May 23, 2008

SO TOO DID WE TELL THE BRITS TO HIT THE BRICKS...:

Powerful Iraqi cleric flirting with Shiite militant message: Iraq's top Shiite cleric quietly hints at harder views against US forces (HAMZA HENDAWI and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, 5/22/08, AP)

Iraq's most influential Shiite cleric has been quietly issuing religious edicts declaring that armed resistance against U.S.-led foreign troops is permissible — a potentially significant shift by a key supporter of the Washington-backed government in Baghdad.

The edicts, or fatwas, by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani suggest he seeks to sharpen his long-held opposition to American troops and counter the populist appeal of his main rivals, firebrand Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army militia. [...]

In the past, al-Sistani has avoided answering even abstract questions on whether fighting the U.S. presence in Iraq is allowed by Islam. Such questions sent to his Web site — which he uses to respond to followers' queries — have been ignored. All visitors to his office who had asked the question received a vague response.

The subtle shift could point to his growing impatience with the continued American presence more than five years after the U.S.-led invasion.

It also underlines possible opposition to any agreement by Baghdad to allow a long-term U.S. military foothold in Iraq — part a deal that is currently under negotiation and could be signed as early as July.

Al-Sistani's distaste for the U.S. presence is no secret. In his public fatwas on his Web site, he blames Washington for many of Iraq's woes.

But a more aggressive tone from the cleric could have worrisome ripples through Iraq's Shiite majority — 65 percent of the country's estimated 27 million population — in which many followers are swayed by his every word.

A longtime official at al-Sistani's office in Najaf would not deny or confirm the edicts issued in private, but hinted that a publicized call for jihad may come later.

"(Al-Sistani) rejects the American presence," he told the AP, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment to media. "He believes they (the Americans) will at the end pay a heavy price for the damage they inflicted on Iraq."


...once they saved us from the French and Indians.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 23, 2008 10:38 AM
Comments

"(Al-Sistani) rejects the American presence," he told the AP, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment to media. "He believes they (the Americans) will at the end pay a heavy price for the damage they inflicted on Iraq."

Oh seriously, a price like what? How heavy? What end?

What a stupid statement.

Posted by: Brandon at May 23, 2008 1:24 PM

He means an Obama presidency.

Posted by: oj at May 23, 2008 3:25 PM
« NO ONE HAS IT HARDER THAN THEIR GRANDDAD DID: | Main | WHO WILL TELL THE MALTHUSIANS?: »