May 9, 2008

AGAIN WITH THE CONFUSION ABOUT LIBERTY AND FREEDOM:

Land of the free?: Liberty in America is not quite as revered as its leaders pretend (Lexington, May 8th 2008, The Economist)

Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act. [...]

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.


Incarceration after failure to use your freedom as universally required of the citizenry is perfectly consistent with liberty. Likewise the incarceration of non-citizens bent on the mass murder of the citizenry.

On the other hand, while it has little to do with freedom, classifying government data is a terrible mistake and only serves to make the already inefficient state bureaucracy even less functional.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 9, 2008 11:34 AM
Comments

Yeah, the authors argument is pretty stupid.

Posted by: pchuck at May 9, 2008 1:58 PM

I don't want to know that the Thornton Affair was a set-up; I want to hear the troops singing, "Green Grow the Lilacs."

Posted by: Lou Gots at May 10, 2008 7:46 PM
« THE THIRD WAY PREVAILS EVERYWHERE BUT DEMOCRATIC CAUCUSES: | Main | PANIC IN SWEET TART PARK (SELF-REFERENCE ALERT): »