April 19, 2008

YOU'D BE BITTER TOO...:

God and Guns: The only healthy way to fly (Mark Steyn, 4/19/08, National Review)

In my book America Alone, I note a global survey on optimism: 61 per cent of Americans were optimistic about the future, 29 per cent of the French, 15 per cent of Germans. Take it from a foreigner: In my experience, Americans are the least “bitter” people in the developed world. Secular gun-free big-government Europe doesn’t seem to have done anything for people’s happiness. Consider by way of example the words of Keith Reade. He’s not an Obama speechwriter, he’s a writer for the London Daily Mirror. And the day after the 2004 presidential election he expressed his frustration in an alarmingly Obamaesque way:

Were I a Kerry voter, though, I’d feel deep anger, not only at them returning Bush to power, but for allowing the outside world to lump us all into the same category of moronic muppets. The self-righteous, gun-totin’, military-lovin’, sister-marryin’, abortion-hatin’, gay-loathin’, foreigner-despisin’, non-passport ownin’ red-necks, who believe God gave America the biggest d*** in the world so it could urinate on the rest of us and make their land “free and strong.”

Well, that’s certainly why I supported Bush, but I’m not sure it entirely accounts for the other 62,039,073 incontinent rednecks. Mr Reade, though, does usefully enumerate some of the distinctive features that separate America from the rest of the west. “Self-righteous”? If you want a public culture that reeks of indestructible faith in its own righteousness, try Europe — especially when they’re talking about America: If you disagree with Eutopian wisdom, you must be an idiot. Obama and far too many Democrats have bought into this delusion, most thoroughly distilled in Thomas Frank’s book What’s The Matter With Kansas?, whose argument is that heartland voters are too dumb (i.e., “moronic muppets”) to vote for their own best interests.

Europeans did “vote for their own best interests” — i.e., cradle-to-grave welfare, 35 hour work-weeks, six weeks of paid vacation, etc — and as a result they now face a perfect storm of unsustainable entitlements, economic stagnation, and declining human capital that’s left them so demographically beholden to unassimilable levels of immigration that they’re being remorselessly Islamized with every passing day. We should thank God (if you’ll forgive the expression) that America’s loser gun-nuts don’t share the same sophisticated rational calculation of “their best interests” as Thomas Frank, Obama, too many Democrats and the European political establishment.


...if the only entertainment available was soccer.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 19, 2008 7:04 AM
Comments

We wouldn't be who we are without the guns, and we wouldn't be who we are without the cars.

You may not like guns and you may pretend that you do not like cars, but without these things this would be a very different place.

Posted by: Lou Gots at April 19, 2008 10:38 AM

The belief that you're better than Washington or Lincoln because you have a car is just gay.

Posted by: oj at April 19, 2008 1:02 PM

Unexpected truth from Dr. Who - Europeeeee

is at war with Ham - Erica - not yet, then something like, that's debatable.

Posted by: Sandy P at April 19, 2008 2:49 PM

I'd be bitter if I were an Arsenal fan.

Posted by: Jorge Curioso at April 19, 2008 3:25 PM

Washington, especially, was of the Ritter class. Lincoln pulled himself up to it. The spritual effect of the car is that, with us, ordinary men and women, such as ate the dust at the side of the road all through human history, presume to ride.

Posted by: Lou Gots at April 20, 2008 8:48 AM

Yes, Washington and Lincoln would have held those who chose driving over riding in contempt. Men who love machines and not horses are less human than their ancestors.

Posted by: oj at April 20, 2008 12:41 PM
« THE ACORNS WANT TO BE LIKE EACH OTHER...: | Main | THEY ALL PRAISE SCHUMPETER, BUT THEY'RE TERRIFIED OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION (via Charlie Herzog): »