April 27, 2008

MEMORIAL? HOW ABOUT A PLAQUE?:

Glad Bush Is Still Around (Paul Johnson, 05.05.08, Forbes)

There is no doubt that attacking the American homeland remains the prime objective of Muslim fundamentalist leaders. Yet they have not done so. One reason for this is the success of Mr. Bush's team in learning the lessons of Sept. 11 and building a security system of impressive strength and sensitivity. It has yet to be breached. Also, the suicide bombers fear being sent to Guantánamo more than they fear death itself. It is right that the prime defender of democracy and freedom should strike terror into the hearts of terrorists.

Equally, if not more important, is the way in which Mr. Bush--partly by accident but mainly by design--has switched the war's theater of operations to the death-dealers' territory. At the time of Sept. 11 the battlefield was the undefended West, with its great, peaceful cities. The civilian population was exposed to mass murder at the hands of carefully trained and well-equipped fanatics. Now, thanks to the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan-- which were achieved at relatively minor cost--the battlefield has been decisively switched to the Muslim heartlands. And in the Middle East the war is being waged against the fundamentalists by the highly trained and superbly equipped professional armed forces of the U.S., Britain and other nations. The results of this are reflected in the casualty figures.

It's true that more than 4,000 U.S. servicemen and -women have been killed in this five-year conflict. But considering the extent of the operations, the importance of the war and the threat to the U.S. populace posed by these terrorists, this total is small. In World War I up to 60,000 casualties were inflicted in a single day. And there were many occasions during World War II when the U.S. and Britain lost more than 4,000 men in a one-day operation.


Not to denigrate their service to their country at all, but there are 140 panels in the Vietnam Memorial for some 58,000 guys. A corresponding structure for the Iraq War would have just 10. It's been a nearly casualty free war but liberated 20+ million people and deposed one of the world's most murderous tyrants.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 27, 2008 5:32 PM
Comments

Me too Paul.

Posted by: erp at April 27, 2008 7:51 PM

I wish I'd said that.

Posted by: Lou Gots at April 27, 2008 10:28 PM

Fighting over there is worth the price of all the Zakarias and Albrights and Obamas who complain about America's standing in the world.

One US soldier on somebody else's soil is worth a thousand State Department flunkys. And a thousand Democratic politicians.

Posted by: jim hamlen at April 27, 2008 10:38 PM

Our casualties were trivial as far as the original regime change was concerned, but since
our subsequent occupation was benign and friendly, one would have thought that we would not have suffered the resultant significant losses, aproximately 4000 deaths and over 25,000 injured and maimed troops.

What should have occurred was (1)quickly moving troops into an independant Kurdistan and declaring such, (2) appointing a Shiite strongman to prosecute the resultant civil war against the Sunni, (3) give air support to the Shiite regime for that endeavor.

Instead Bush has spent several years attempting to install a Democracy which neither the Shia nor Sunni are not interested in. Furthermore we are wasting time building castles larger than Saddam's in order to send a few diplomats to the country, but of course not actually requiring them to get out into the country.

Posted by: h-man at April 28, 2008 10:07 AM

benign occupation is an oxymoron. you occupy anenemy.

Posted by: oj at April 28, 2008 11:34 AM
« PANTSED YA: | Main | COMMITTEE ON UNISLAMIC ACTIVITIES: »