March 22, 2008
FROM THE ARCHIVES: GUESS WHO BLEW IT AGAIN
Pick Seen as Sign of Contradiction (Ian Fisher, Not-the New-York-Times)
CAESAREA PHILIPPI (20 Kislev). Yesterday's surprise announcement that doctrinal hardliner Jesus of Nazareth had been anointed "messiah" provoked mixed reactions in the diverse and sometimes fractious Israelite community, ranging from cautious disappointment to frank despair."I see it as a missed opportunity," said Herodias Schneidkopf, a Galilean incest-rights activist. "Many of us were hoping for someone more open to leadership roles for women and more appreciative of our experience. I don't feel valued."
Respected archpriest Caiaphas Bar Nun agreed. "Above all, the messiah should be a good listener. How can we as a faith community keep credibility among the youth of today if we cling to every jot and tittle of an outmoded social code while thousands die of leprosy and hunger? Today's highly educated Judahite community isn't satisfied with the old answers. I'm afraid it's a missed opportunity."
Even some members of the Messiah''s personal entourage expressed misgivings. The Rev. J.E. "Dimples" Iscariot, S.J., a media consultant, did not hide his regret. "A missed opportunity, I'm afraid. We in the Society of Judas traditionally enjoy a special relationship to the messiah, but we'll find this choice very hard to explain to gays and lesbians--I mean, of course, to gomorrhaists and sodomitesses--as well as to the divorced and the marginalized. Why just the other day I saw 300 denarii, which might have been used to help find a cure for leprosy, squandered on wholly unnecessary ritual excesses."
Fighting the spread of leprosy is a vexed issue among contemporary Palestinians. Most polls show Israelites widely ignore official teachings on ethical matters, preferring to follow their own conscience. Some see Jesus' moral conservatism as a rigidity that leads to disfigurement and death in at-risk populations--and that may ultimately doom his movement to irrelevance.
"Yesterday's unction was an opportunity missed," insisted real-estate broker Sapphira Glass. "Today's young professionals don't find their own experience reflected in a one-size-fits-all morality that limits options and encodes patriarchal bias. I mean, sacrificing one's newborns to Moloch is a tragic but often necessary choice, and many of us find the language of apostasy alienating and judgmental." [NYT copyeditor''s note: Need some quote from supporter----J.L.]
"It all comes down to power," countered maverick theologian Fr. Richard Maccabeus, retired professor of applied autology, who pointed out that the successful candidate had almost no pastoral experience. "What we''re seeing is a right-wing restorationist fantasy in its death throes. Intelligent Israelites aren't buying. We want to be heard. We want someone who speaks not with authority but like us academics--I mean, of course, like the scribes and the pharisees. One can only call it a missed opportunity."
The Procurator of Judea was unavailable for comment.
[Originally posted: September 21, 2005]
Tweet
WOW
Posted by: Anonymous at September 21, 2005 6:30 PMNot bad. Sort of like Mort Sahl's, "Are there any groups I haven't offended yet?"
Posted by: Lou Gots at September 21, 2005 6:56 PMCreative.
Posted by: Dave W. at September 21, 2005 10:23 PMWhat!? No quote from one of the whipped money lenders? "That guy can't be the messiah, man - he's no good for business".
Posted by: ratbert at September 22, 2005 12:46 AMThis is funny, but what's the point? Jesus was a disaster for the Jews, they would have been better off had he never been born.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at September 22, 2005 1:10 PMRobert:
That is beneath you. Do you really think this parody is about first century Jews?
Posted by: Anonymous at September 22, 2005 2:46 PMAnon, no, I know what the parody is about. It is depicting a group of politicians pandering to special-interest groups by rejecting an appointee (not unlike a supreme court nominee)to a post, and supposedly showing that these politicians will reject anyone, regardless of qualifications, Jesus being the supposed candidate whose qualifications noone can or should be able to question.
But that is my point. For the Jews, Jesus was the absolutely worst qualified candidate for messiah. He wasn't there to save Judaism or the Jewish people, but to destroy their religion and status as the Chosen people. And the faith that he inspired nearly succeeded in destroying them.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at September 23, 2005 11:30 AMRight now Jesus is doing his best to prop up the Israeli and Palestinian economies. During the intifada war, tourism took a big hit in Israel and the territories, but while many affluent tourists stayed away, Christian budget travelers from places such as Nigeria and India made up for part of the shortfall.
I worked on a fishing boat on the Kinneret (the Sea of Galilee) last year. It was touching to hear sari-clad Indian ladies ask us if we could sell them bottles of the lake water.
Who was Jesus? My guess would be, an itinerant rabbi and faith healer, and not as revolutionary as most Christians think. The Christians, of course, think Jesus was the son of God.
Posted by: Eugene S. at September 24, 2005 12:07 PM
Boy, I'll bet Frank Rich is pissed.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at September 21, 2005 5:39 PM