January 30, 2008

AS CONSERVATIVE AS A GAGGLE OF WOMEN GETS:

American Teachers: What values do they hold? (Robert Slater, Winter 2008, Eduction Next)

Over the last four decades, Americans in general have grown more tolerant of homosexuality. In the 1970s, 13 percent of nonteachers said there is nothing wrong with homosexuality. By 2006, 32 percent of them felt this way. During the 1970s, 18 percent of teachers also saw nothing wrong with it. By 2006, about a third saw nothing wrong with it; there was no significant difference between the two groups. If we control for education, however, we find that in each of the four decades, teachers are from 10 to 15 percentage points less likely than other Americans with 16 or more years of schooling to see nothing wrong with homosexuality (see Figure 2).

About 60 percent of teachers and an equal proportion of other Americans say they are opposed to legalized abortion. Analysis of the survey data show class, gender, and education are all positively correlated with being in favor of legalized abortion. Americans who place themselves in the middle or upper classes, women, and the more highly educated all tend to favor abortion being legal. But teachers are about 14 percentage points more likely to oppose abortion for any reason than highly educated nonteachers—that is, they are more conservative on the issue.

American teachers tend to be more conservative than other Americans on issues of pornography as well. In 2006, 50 percent of teachers said they would make pornography illegal, while only 38 percent of nonteachers shared this view.The difference between teachers and highly educated nonteachers is even greater: only 29 percent of nonteachers would make pornography illegal.

Religion

God and religion play an important role in the lives of more than half of all Americans. In a study conducted by the European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association, 58 percent of the U.S. population said that God was very important in their lives, a greater percentage by far than in the populations of other developed countries such as Great Britain (14 percent), France (8), Italy (33), Japan (7), Spain (17), or Germany (9).

Religion and education have always had a close relationship in the United States. The country’s first institution of higher education,Harvard College, was established in 1636 to train ministers. Many of the country’s first teachers were ministers and parsons. Even when women came to dominate the teaching field, religious values were still a priority. We should not be surprised if elementary and secondary school teachers value religion highly, perhaps even more highly than Americans in general. But do they?

According to the NORC survey data from the current decade, about 37 percent of teachers say they attend church one or more times per week,while 26 percent of other Americans say they do so. Controlling for the education of nonteachers does not affect this difference. Of those nonteachers with 16 or more years of schooling, 28 percent regularly attend church.

Looking at the data across the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s,we find that teachers are about 9 to 11 percentage points more likely than other Americans as a whole to pray one or more times per day. During the 1980s and 1990s, Americans were asked how close they felt to God. Teachers were about 8 percentage points more likely than other Americans to report feeling “extremely close” to God.

Why do teachers, by these measures, seem more religious than other Americans? Perhaps the differences are due to gender. Most teachers are women, and women are more likely than men to be frequent churchgoers and more likely to pray one or more times a day. In fact, we find teachers of both genders to be more religious than nonteachers. Female teachers are about 8 percentage points more likely to attend church frequently than female nonteachers, and male teachers are 16 percentage points more likely to attend church frequently than male nonteachers (see Figure 3). Teachers are apparently more religious than other Americans, regardless of gender or education.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 30, 2008 1:40 PM
Comments

And they are overwhelmingly Democrats. Why? Because the Democrats promise to give them (via the NEA) more money.

Posted by: Brandon at January 30, 2008 4:26 PM

Teachers do what the unions tell them to do. What they think is irrelevant.

Posted by: erp at January 30, 2008 4:27 PM

A bit of a pleasant surprise, though ... at least for moi. I would like to the data disaggregated by public and private school teachers.

Posted by: ghostcat at January 30, 2008 4:48 PM

Gosh, teachers hold kid-friendly positions on social issues! What a shock! Who could have predicted that?

Posted by: b at January 30, 2008 5:48 PM

Gee,

Data massaged by an ED Prof wonk, squeezing "people with more than 16 years of schooling" into a box, and comparing them to teachers.

This study is pretty much a crock. Erp said it best. These people do what the NEA tells them. They are surpassed in mendacity only by the oily, lying, administrative class - all of whom would serve more of a social service either serving - or standing - in a bread line.

If you aren't for 100% fully funded school choice, you don't hold "kid friendly" values.

Posted by: Bruno at January 30, 2008 6:27 PM

Bruno, you can't know many teachers if you think them full if "mendacity". The NEA does the things that it does because the teachers want them, especially more money,

Posted by: Brandon at January 30, 2008 7:07 PM

No matter how bad your education you can probably figure out why 16+ matters.

Posted by: oj at January 30, 2008 8:22 PM

Brandon,

I know a few teachers, and I respect their dedication to their calling, but I have no respect for their hiding behind their political clout or their filthy unions.

Here is my point.
I don't give a damn about teachers.

I give a damn about an 'educated populace.'

I give a damn about children, and the number of neurons connected in their heads.

I keep on trying to point out that, as an informed resident of Illinois, I've discovered that public education is more akin to a money-laundering scheme for adults than it is an education system.

Where ever you are, your state is not far behind.

I stand by my statement. If you are against fully funded school choice, you do not support an 'educated populace.' You support an unsustainable education bureaucracy.

The article OJ mentions is 90% crap. An undergrad researcher with an ounce of direction could rip it to shreds. I simply lack the time to do so myself.

Posted by: Bruno at January 30, 2008 11:53 PM

The study is fatally flawed. Most "religious" teachers are concentrated in Christian schools. I suspect if it measured public school teachers we'd find high concentrations of atheists.

Posted by: Brian at January 31, 2008 2:12 AM

So you totally miss the point of the 16+? An educated populace isn't republican, nor Republican.

Posted by: oj at January 31, 2008 8:08 AM

That highly educated ppl are less republican/Republican is not news. I await the study comparing public school teachers (exclusivly) with other 16+'s. Then we'd know what "virtues" are being taught in our public schools ie Revolution 101?

Posted by: Brian at January 31, 2008 12:00 PM

Sixteen years = highly educated in soft "science" mind rot.

Posted by: erp at February 1, 2008 9:58 AM
« THE LAST METROSEXUAL: | Main | WE DID IT, WHY NOT YOU?: »