December 16, 2007
WINNING ODDLY:
What Bush really won in Bali: For the first time, all nations said they will consider ways to reduce global warming – as Bush sought. (CS Monitor, December 17, 2007)
Is it a date that will live in infamy? On Dec. 14, at the climate-change talks in Bali, poor and rich nations agreed – for the first time – to each consider ways to reduce greenhouse gases. Oddly, though, this historic feat was a win for the Bush White House.
No win, no feat. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 16, 2007 6:47 PM
Comments
CSM just another mouthpiece for the libs. If they're all such pacifists, why are they so intent on making everything a contest of winners and losers?
Posted by: erp at December 16, 2007 10:36 PMerp:
Because they are losing (power, respect, money, even expense accounts).
Posted by: ratbert at December 17, 2007 9:25 AMAll the less reason to make it a contest.
Posted by: erp at December 17, 2007 10:49 AM
« A ROCKEFELLER WHO'S NOT EVEN COMPETITIVE IN THE NORTHEAST: |
Main
| BETTER WATERBOARDING THAN "LONGER": »