September 22, 2007

IN ESSENCE...:

To 'Save the Children' Capitalism is the Answer (Rich Lowry, 9/22/07, Real Clear Politics)

It is no coincidence that as UNICEF was reporting the drop in child mortality, the World Bank was reporting global poverty rates had fallen as part of an extraordinary worldwide economic boom. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson calls it "far and away the strongest global economy I've seen in my business lifetime."

The global economy is growing at a 5 percent clip, higher than the 3 percent of the period from 1960 to 1980 and the 4.7 percent from 1960 to 1980. As U.S. News & World Report points out, "Gross global product is three times as big as it was in 1970 so the global economy is not only growing faster, but there's more to grow.

In a worldwide instance of trickle-down economics, the growth is diminishing the ranks of the poor. According to the World Bank, developing countries have averaged 3.9 percent growth since 2000, contributing "to rapidly falling poverty rates in all developing regions over the past few years." In 1990, 1.25 billion people lived on less than $1 a day. In 2004, less than a billion did, even though world population increased 20 percent in the interim.

When a developing country gets richer, it means that people living there are less likely to be malnourished and - as infrastructure improves - more likely to have access to clean water and to sanitation. This is a boon to health.


...pretty nearly the whole world is America in the '90s.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 22, 2007 8:06 AM
Comments

The 1890s.

Posted by: Ibid at September 22, 2007 8:18 AM

Rarely do we see an account, nor. for that matter, remark which more closely fits the paradigm of cultural evolution.

Remember, it is the law given by the world government which enables peoples to shuck off the surpassed ways of thinking and acting which have been holding them back.

Consider that the great progress in China the article extols was only made possible by that nation's having cast aside Boxer-Lenism.

Posted by: Lou Gots at September 22, 2007 8:59 AM

Ib:

Bingo!

www.brothersjudd.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/reviews.detail/book_id/1369/

Posted by: oj at September 22, 2007 9:16 AM

"The global economy is growing at a 5 percent clip, higher than the 3 percent of the period from 1960 to 1980 and the 4.7 percent from 1960 to 1980."

So, which was it from 1960 to 1980, 3 percent or 4.7 percent?

Posted by: Dave at September 23, 2007 2:08 AM

The basic public health argument (clean water, sewers, etc.) is one that always seems to get downplayed for immunization campaigns (which are also important). When I was in Kiwanis one of the big projects was iodizing salt. Simple, but effective.

Clean water, sewage and garbage removal, electrification - these simple things have an incredible effect on the economic life of a country because they support that country's greatest resource, its people.

Posted by: Mikey [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 23, 2007 5:33 PM
« THE BROWNING OF AMERICA: | Main | NEVER AGAIN TIANANMEN: »