August 30, 2007
THE NEOCONS' OWN UDAY:
Iraqi Shiite heir steps into a tough role: Ammar Hakim, scion of a top clerical family, is set to lead a party that is the chief U.S. ally in Iraq, but has deep ties to Iran. (Alexandra Zavis, August 30, 2007, Los Angeles Times)
Ammar Hakim and Sadr are close in age, and both are the charismatic scions of clerical families that have long vied for leadership of Iraq's Shiite majority. But Hakim, a polished orator with a classical Arabic diction, is a sharp contrast to the gruff Sadr, who speaks in the colloquial dialect of the Iraqi poor. Hakim plays down the rivalry, noting that his mother is from the Sadr clan.Hakim was groomed from an early age for a leadership role. The family home in Najaf was a frequent hide-out for men battling the Iraqi regime. In a recent interview with The Times, he said that from age 4, it was his job to pass food in secret to the fugitives. By the time he was 7, he was acting as a lookout to help his father elude Hussein's henchmen.
"I was able to spot the security men even if they were dressed in civilian clothing," he said, breaking into one of many smiles. His family fled to Iran in 1979 to escape persecution, and by age 9, Hakim was addressing thousands of Shiite faithful at mosques and religious festivals there.
Many here and in Washington are suspicious of Hakim's close ties to Iran, where he has spent more than half his life. Iran's Revolutionary Guard trained, equipped and at one point led the Badr Organization, which fought alongside Iran during the 1980s war against Iraq.
By contrast, Sadr is an Iraqi nationalist who routinely denounces both U.S. and Iranian influence, although he, too, has accepted assistance from Iran and spends considerable time there.
During constitutional negotiations after Hussein was ousted, some supreme council members advocated giving senior Shiite clerics, or ayatollahs, veto power over legislation. Hakim argued for changing the country's name to the Islamic Republic of Iraq, a proposal he now says was intended to recognize that most Iraqis are Muslim, not to exclude those who are not.
Hakim has alienated Sunni Arabs by pushing for greater regional autonomy and, until recently, resisting proposals to allow members of Hussein's ousted Baathist regime to take jobs in the government and military.
His tendency to travel in flashy convoys studded with gunmen have led some to dub him "Uday" Hakim, after Hussein's corrupt and violent son.
Note that he is exactly who the Right claims Sadr is.
MORE:
Allawi Gets a Baathist Endorsement (BOBBY GHOSH, 8/30/07, TIME)
Iyad Allawi's bid to become Iraq's prime minister again has received an endorsement from an unexpected source: the Baath Party. A spokesman for the exiled leadership of Saddam Hussein's old party told TIME that Allawi "is the best person at this time to be given the task of ruling Iraq." He said he hoped that Allawi would pave the way for the Baath Party to "return to the political life of Iraq, where we rightfully belong."Posted by Orrin Judd at August 30, 2007 3:31 PMThe spokesman, known only as Abu Hala, said the Baath leadership under Saddam's deputy, Izzat al-Douri, were "more than willing to work with Allawi, because we see him as a nationalist and Iraqi patriot, and not a sectarian figure." He said the party didn't agree with all of Allawi's policies when he headed a transitional Iraqi government in 2004, but "we have no doubt that he would represent the interests of Iraq, not of Shi'ites or Sunnis or any other group."
Note that all 'religious' leaders who travel with lots of gunmen are evil, and are exactly who the Right claims Mookie is. They are Sonny Corleone with turbans and Qurans.
And remember, the 2nd leading Shi'a (after Sistani) was killed right after the invasion ended (Khoie). Somebody wanted him out of the way. Iran?
They are the Pope.
Posted by: oj at August 30, 2007 6:56 PMSadr is their Malcolm, Hakim their Jesse.
Posted by: ghostcat at August 30, 2007 7:40 PMAnd the great tragedy of American blacks was not following Brother Malcolm.
Posted by: oj at August 30, 2007 10:30 PMWho turned out to be the lesser (and former) pimp.
Posted by: ghostcat at August 30, 2007 11:23 PMAnd insisted that blacks not be mere welfare whores.
Posted by: oj at August 31, 2007 6:17 AMPopes? Ha.
They want to be Saddam. It's what they know. The Shi'a who are what you describe (somewhat democratic, spiritual) stick with Sistani and the other theological clerics. The screaming imams try to peel the people away and make them screaming street warriors.
Sistani has survived several attempts on his life. If these guys were anything but thugs, they wouldn't dare try to kill him. But they want to - and they can't stop.
Sadr is more like Al Sharpton (or Winnie Mandela). And who is Calypso Louie?
Posted by: jim hamlen at August 31, 2007 6:44 AMThe Shi'a know nothing of Ba'athism. It's a Western rationalist disorder. Of course they want Sistani dead. His best chance of being kept alive is Mookie purging the enemy.
Posted by: oj at August 31, 2007 7:11 AMMookie is a thug, just like Saddam. Hakim Jr. is about the same. The other gang leaders are, too. Being Shi'a doesn't inoculate them against evil.
The Shi'a have been oppressed by the Sunni for 80+ years - do you want them to experience the same from their own?
Remember, the Sunni didn't kill Khoie. And who has been behind the attempts on Sistani? Other Shi'a.
The way things are going now with the Sunni tribes, the Shi'a would do well to get behind Maliki (or some other political leader), and start dealing with their goons and foreign agents. To a large degree, the Sunni have.
Posted by: jim hamlen at August 31, 2007 5:54 PMYes, establishing a functional state consists of being oppressed by your own. That's all liberty is.
Posted by: oj at August 31, 2007 7:00 PM